2012
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unique Asymmetrical Stroop Effect in Absolute Pitch Possessors

Abstract: The Stroop task has been employed to study automaticity or failures of selective attention for many years. The effect is known to be asymmetrical, with words affecting color naming but not vice versa. In the current work two auditory-visual Stroop-like tasks were devised in order to study the automaticity of pitch processing in both absolute pitch (AP) possessors and musically trained controls without AP (nAP). In the tone naming task, participants were asked to name the auditory tone while ignoring a visual n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Synesthesia and absolute pitch share some common neural mechanism (Loui et al, 2012). The association between note and label in absolute pitch possessors is automatic (Akiva-Kabiri and Henik, 2012; Schulze et al, 2012), as is the case with associations in synesthesia (Ward, 2013). Genetic linkage and co segregation between absolute pitch and synesthesia has also been observed (Gregersen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Synesthesia and absolute pitch share some common neural mechanism (Loui et al, 2012). The association between note and label in absolute pitch possessors is automatic (Akiva-Kabiri and Henik, 2012; Schulze et al, 2012), as is the case with associations in synesthesia (Ward, 2013). Genetic linkage and co segregation between absolute pitch and synesthesia has also been observed (Gregersen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When two syllable names were heard in the experiment, they automatically activated a representation of sequential relation according to their positions in the sequence. Note that the participants were non-musicians who could not identify the fixed relationships between absolute pitches and their corresponding syllable names, which has been shown in many previous studies (Akiva-Kabiri & Henik, 2012;Grégoire et al, 2013Grégoire et al, , 2014Schulze et al, 2013;Tsai, Chen, Wen, & Chou, 2015). Therefore, in the experiment, participants did not activate the specific pitch height that each syllable name represented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To empirically establish the labeling automaticity in AP musicians, we applied a behavioral audio-visual like task (Akiva-Kabiri and Henik, 2012;Hsieh and Saberi, 2008;Itoh et al, 2005;Schulze et al, 2013;Stroop, 89 1935). The auditory stimuli consisted of five pure tones (duration = 500 ms, 10 ms linear fade-in; 50 ms linear 90 fade-out), which were created using Audacity (version 2.1.2, http://www.audacityteam.org/).…”
Section: Stroop-like Task 87mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the label is part of the cognitive representation of the pitch and is 43 automatically activated when a particular pitch is perceived (Levitin and Rogers, 2005). This automaticity has 44 been empirically demonstrated using Stroop-like tasks, in which AP musicians responded slower in trials where 45 the pitch of a tone did not match a simultaneously presented label (Akiva-Kabiri and Henik, 2012;Hsieh and 46 Saberi, 2008;Itoh et al, 2005;Schulze et al, 2013). Thus, we predicted that the neural representations underlying 47 listening and labeling show high similarity in AP musicians because they automatically label pitches during 48 listening and, to comply with the task demands, also label pitches during labeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%