2020
DOI: 10.1159/000510027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unique Case of Recurrent Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Caused by Two Metachronous Dieulafoy’s Lesions: The Role of EUS Evaluation

Abstract: Introduction: Dieulafoy’s lesion (DL) is a rare but important cause of acute, severe, life-threatening, and recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). It is frequently difficult to diagnose DL with upper GI endoscopy (UGIE), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) may be valuable. There are only 2 reported bleeding cases caused by two synchronous DL but no reported cases of two metachronous DL. Case Report: A 28-year-old healthy male presented with acute severe UGIB. UGIE was inconclusive. Systematic EUS m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EUS has been described as a useful tool both for diagnosing the etiology of gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure or recurrent origin and for localizing the vessel responsible for bleeding for interventional vascular radiology-directed hemostatic therapy. [ 4 ] Our main limitations lie in that it is a single-center study including a low number of patients, so we also accept that therapeutic efficacy is strongly related to the available local experience, which may bias the results. Still, larger studies, possibly including randomized controlled trials, are needed to confirm these results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUS has been described as a useful tool both for diagnosing the etiology of gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure or recurrent origin and for localizing the vessel responsible for bleeding for interventional vascular radiology-directed hemostatic therapy. [ 4 ] Our main limitations lie in that it is a single-center study including a low number of patients, so we also accept that therapeutic efficacy is strongly related to the available local experience, which may bias the results. Still, larger studies, possibly including randomized controlled trials, are needed to confirm these results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%