1969
DOI: 10.2307/1995352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unique Decomposition Theorem for 3-Manifolds with Connected Boundary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A bordered 3-manifold H is said to be a handlebody of genus g iff H is the disk-sum (i.e., the boundary connected-sum) of g copies of the solid-torus D 2 × S 1 (see Gross [3], Swarup [16], etc.). A handlebody of genus g is characterized as a regular neighborhood N (P ; R 3 ) of a connected 1-polyhedron P with Euler characteristic χ(P ) = 1−g in the 3-dimensional Euclidean space R 3 and as an irreducible bordered 3-manifold M with connected boundary whose fundamental group π 1 (M ) is a free group of rank g (see Ochiai [10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bordered 3-manifold H is said to be a handlebody of genus g iff H is the disk-sum (i.e., the boundary connected-sum) of g copies of the solid-torus D 2 × S 1 (see Gross [3], Swarup [16], etc.). A handlebody of genus g is characterized as a regular neighborhood N (P ; R 3 ) of a connected 1-polyhedron P with Euler characteristic χ(P ) = 1−g in the 3-dimensional Euclidean space R 3 and as an irreducible bordered 3-manifold M with connected boundary whose fundamental group π 1 (M ) is a free group of rank g (see Ochiai [10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One says that a 3-manifold F with connected nonvacuous boundary is A-prime if F is not a 3-cell and whenever F is homeomorphic to a disk sum MAM', either M or AF is a 3-cell. The following theorem is proved by the author in [1]: Theorem 1. Let M be a 3-manifold with connected, nonvacuous boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 3 is an extension of Lemma 6 of [1]. One obtains a proof of Lemma 3 by generalizing the steps in the proof of Lemma 6 of [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations