1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01139205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A universal constant in temporal segmentation of human speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been observed (Getty 1975) that it applies only for stimulus durations up to approximately 2-3 s. Thus, different temporal mechanisms are involved, if longer intervals have to be processed; this result corresponds to observations when the duration of temporal intervals have to be reproduced (see above). Experiments on the temporal structure of spontaneous speech on adults ( Vollrath et al 1992) and on children (Kowal et al 1975) also show that spoken language is embedded in temporal windows of up to 3 s duration giving speech its rhythmic structure (Martin 1972;Kien & Kemp 1994). And even cultural artefacts follow this principle of temporal segmentation allowing rhythmic control: Musical motifs have been observed to blend nicely into a temporal window of approximately 3 s, and the same is true for poetry as the duration of a spoken line in many languages corresponds to this duration.…”
Section: Review Temporal Perception E Pö Ppel 1891mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed (Getty 1975) that it applies only for stimulus durations up to approximately 2-3 s. Thus, different temporal mechanisms are involved, if longer intervals have to be processed; this result corresponds to observations when the duration of temporal intervals have to be reproduced (see above). Experiments on the temporal structure of spontaneous speech on adults ( Vollrath et al 1992) and on children (Kowal et al 1975) also show that spoken language is embedded in temporal windows of up to 3 s duration giving speech its rhythmic structure (Martin 1972;Kien & Kemp 1994). And even cultural artefacts follow this principle of temporal segmentation allowing rhythmic control: Musical motifs have been observed to blend nicely into a temporal window of approximately 3 s, and the same is true for poetry as the duration of a spoken line in many languages corresponds to this duration.…”
Section: Review Temporal Perception E Pö Ppel 1891mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…phonological, morphological and syntactic information) traces are still active in working memory. Prosodic phrasing seems to be adapted to these time-based working memory limits: Vollrath, Kazenwadel, and Krüger (1992) reported a median length of 2.6 s for intonation phrases in German conversations and Roll, Lindgren, Alter, and Horne (2012) showed that readers parsed utterances into 2.7 s long implicit prosodic phrases. Prosodic phrasing in turn has been observed to influence syntactic processing: embedded clauses following explicit prosodic phrase boundaries increased listeners' expectation of main clause structure (Roll, Horne, & Lindgren, 2009, 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, that is the time we need to turn the Necker cube or see a face in Rubin's vase (Fraisse 1984;Schleidt and Kien 1997), and, in general, to take a different perceptual perspective when dealing with ambiguous stimuli. Even naturalistic stimuli, such as spoken language, consist of ''units'' in 3-s-long temporal windows (Vollrath et al 1992). When people are asked to recite poems, they speak in a rhythm of 3 s, regardless of their native language (Turner and Pöppel 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%