2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10409-016-0605-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A universal method to calculate the surface energy density of spherical surfaces in crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the curvature effect will be non-negligible when the surface curvatures become larger than 1/5 nm −1 , which is in consistent with the conclusion mentioned in Ref. [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the curvature effect will be non-negligible when the surface curvatures become larger than 1/5 nm −1 , which is in consistent with the conclusion mentioned in Ref. [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Through extensive theoretical calculations of the surface tension of most of the liquid metals, Aqra et al used the fraction of broken bonds in liquid metals to calculate surface tension and surface energy [ 19 , 20 ]. An analytical approach is developed to estimate the surface energy density of spherical surfaces through that of planar surfaces using a geometrical analysis and the scaling law [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This surface energy density is highly dependent on the nanoparticles size. Two opposite trends of size-dependent surface energy density of nanomaterials have, however, been reported by different studies [19][20][21]. Yin Yao et al reported that surface energy density decreases with the increase in nanoparticles size [22].…”
Section: Hr-tem Observations Of Nanofluidsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Yin Yao et al reported that surface energy density decreases with the increase in nanoparticles size [22]. In another recent study by Wang et al, atomic simulations done to calculate the surface energy density of spherical nanosurfaces found that the average surface energy density almost remains constant once its radius exceeds 5 nm [21].…”
Section: Hr-tem Observations Of Nanofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling between γ and particle size aligns with previous reports on crystalline NPs. 33,40 Such ambiguity in evaluating γ bring difficulty is supporting continuum models of NPs evolution by atomistic simulations.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%