2013
DOI: 10.2174/1573411011309030014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validated Method for Urinary Cotinine Quantification Used to Classify Active and Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collection of a urine sample was performed in workers at the end of the work-shift and after at least three consecutive working days, while it was performed in the late afternoon for control subjects. Urine samples were stored at −20 • C. Cotinine concentrations were quantified with a previously published method via LC-MS/MS [37]. Urinary creatinine was measured using the Jaffè colorimetric method [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collection of a urine sample was performed in workers at the end of the work-shift and after at least three consecutive working days, while it was performed in the late afternoon for control subjects. Urine samples were stored at −20 • C. Cotinine concentrations were quantified with a previously published method via LC-MS/MS [37]. Urinary creatinine was measured using the Jaffè colorimetric method [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 1.0 µg/m 3 for BEN-A and 0.8 µg/m 3 for MTBE-A, 15 ng/L for BEN-U and 10 ng/L for MTBE-U, 20 µg/L for tt -MA and 0.1 µg/L for SPMA. Levels of urinary cotinine (COT-U), a biomarker of tobacco smoking, were measured by LC-MS/MS, with a LOQ of 1 µg/L [ 24 ]. Subjects with COT-U concentrations below 100 µg/L were classified as “non-smokers”, while those with COT-U concentrations equal to or above 100 µg/L were classified as “smokers”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants completed a detailed questionnaire about current active and passive smoke exposure [ 18 ]. The used items were adapted from available questionnaires used in large population surveys and had been verified in our previous studies [ 18 , 20 ]. The questionnaire was reviewed by a trained interviewer at the moment of urine sample collection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%