2010
DOI: 10.1080/10409280902858764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validation of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System in Finnish Kindergartens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
134
2
12

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
17
134
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The CLASS has been widely used in the United States and in several European countries, and its validity has been established based on positive associations with other quality measures (e.g., Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale; Harms, Clifford, & Cryer, 1998), as well as based on positive associations with children's social and academic development (Cadima, Leal, & Burchinal, 2010;Mashburn et al, 2008;Pakarinen et al, 2010). However, although the three-factor solution has been shown to provide the best fit to the data in some studies (Hamre et al, 2014;Pakarinen et al, 2010), very high correlations among the three domains Running head: PROCESS QUALITY AND SELF-REGULATION 14 have been reported (Pakarinen et al, 2010), which is particularly problematic when trying to examine the extent to which each domain is related to specific outcomes (Hamre et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CLASS has been widely used in the United States and in several European countries, and its validity has been established based on positive associations with other quality measures (e.g., Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale; Harms, Clifford, & Cryer, 1998), as well as based on positive associations with children's social and academic development (Cadima, Leal, & Burchinal, 2010;Mashburn et al, 2008;Pakarinen et al, 2010). However, although the three-factor solution has been shown to provide the best fit to the data in some studies (Hamre et al, 2014;Pakarinen et al, 2010), very high correlations among the three domains Running head: PROCESS QUALITY AND SELF-REGULATION 14 have been reported (Pakarinen et al, 2010), which is particularly problematic when trying to examine the extent to which each domain is related to specific outcomes (Hamre et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CLASS is an observational measure that assesses the social and emotional climate, as well as the instructional support provided in classrooms. Observers rated the classroom using a 7-point Likert on 10 distinct dimensions that are grouped in three domains (a) Emotional support considers the enthusiasm, enjoyment and the extent to which teachers provide comfort to children; (b) Classroom organization considers teacher's ability to use effective methods to monitor behavior and how well teachers maximize time spent in learning activities; (c) Instructional support considers the strategies used to promote children's higher order thinking skills and creativity, the degree to which teachers' feedback extends children's learning and the use of language-stimulation techniques.The CLASS has been widely used in the United States and in several European countries, and its validity has been established based on positive associations with other quality measures (e.g., Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale; Harms, Clifford, & Cryer, 1998), as well as based on positive associations with children's social and academic development (Cadima, Leal, & Burchinal, 2010;Mashburn et al, 2008;Pakarinen et al, 2010). However, although the three-factor solution has been shown to provide the best fit to the data in some studies (Hamre et al, 2014;Pakarinen et al, 2010), very high correlations among the three domains Running head: PROCESS QUALITY AND SELF-REGULATION 14 have been reported (Pakarinen et al, 2010), which is particularly problematic when trying to examine the extent to which each domain is related to specific outcomes (Hamre et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atendiendo a la idea expresada por Kraschy Carter (2009), los métodos que implican una comprobación rápida y un registro sencillo de lo observado son más fáciles de aplicar por el profesor en una clase durante el proceso de enseñanza. b) Agiliza las tareas de observación y registro del progreso de los alumnos en el aula, haciendo posible una auténtica evaluación continua (Pakarinen et al, 2010). c) Dispone de forma inmediata de toda la información de cada alumno y del conjunto de la clase, facilitando la detección temprana de necesidades y la adopción de medidas de apoyo y de refuerzo (Thelwall, 2000).…”
Section: Procedimientos De Recogida De Informaciónunclassified
“…Although developed in the US, the CLASS-Pre K is widely used in several European countries, including Portugal. Its reliability and validation for different sociocultural contexts has been documented in literature (Cadima, Leal, and Burchinal 2010;Curby et al 2009;Hamre et al 2007;Pakarinen et al 2010). Infant Classrooms' Structural Characteristics Questionnaire (QSC-E; Barros et al 2013).…”
Section: Classroom Assessment Scoring System -Infant (Class-infant; Hmentioning
confidence: 99%