ABSTRACT:The technique of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) was validated successfully and used to study the pharmacokinetics and disposition in dogs of a preclinical drug candidate (7-deaza-2-Cmethyl-adenosine; Compound A), after oral and intravenous administration. The primary objective of this study was to examine whether Compound A displayed linear kinetics across subpharmacological (microdose) and pharmacological dose ranges in an animal model, before initiation of a human microdose study. The AMS-derived disposition properties of Compound A were comparable to data obtained via conventional techniques such as liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and liquid scintillation counting analyses. Compound A displayed multiphasic kinetics and exhibited low plasma clearance (5.8 ml/min/kg), a long terminal elimination half-life (17.5 h), and high oral bioavailability (103%). Currently, there are no published comparisons of the kinetics of a pharmaceutical compound at pharmacological versus subpharmacological doses using microdosing strategies. The present study thus provides the first description of the full pharmacokinetic profile of a drug candidate assessed under these two dosing regimens. The data demonstrated that the pharmacokinetic properties of Compound A following dosing at 0.02 mg/kg were similar to those at 1 mg/kg, indicating that in the case of Compound A, the pharmacokinetics in the dog appear to be linear across this 50-fold dose range. Moreover, the exceptional sensitivity of AMS provided a pharmacokinetic profile of Compound A, even after a microdose, which revealed aspects of the disposition of this agent that were inaccessible by conventional techniques.The applications of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) are broad-ranging and vary from studying environmental and ecological issues such as the isotopic composition of the atmosphere, soil, and water (Hughen et al., 2000;Beck et al., 2001;Keith-Roach et al., 2001;Mironov et al., 2002), to archaeology and volcanology (Stafford et al., 1984;Vogel et al., 1990;Smith et al., 1999), to its use as a bioanalytical tool for nutritional research (Buchholz et al., 1999; Deuker et al., 2000;Weaver and Liebman, 2002). Biomedical applications of AMS and its use in the arena of pharmaceutical research also have been detailed in review articles (Barker and Garner, 1999;Garner, 2000;Turteltaub and Vogel, 2000). To date, most studies on the metabolism and disposition of xenobiotics by AMS have focused on the binding of carcinogens to DNA and proteins (Turteltaub et al., 1990Frantz et al., 1995;Dingley et al., 1999;Li et al., 2003). These studies have demonstrated a linear relationship between dose and DNA adduct formation. Applications of AMS to the field of pharmaceutical sciences have been limited to only a few studies (Kaye et al., 1997;Young et al., 2001;Garner et al., 2002). However, the pharmaceutical industry is becoming increasingly aware of the potential benefits that may accrue from the ultra-high sensitivity afforded by AMS in terms of evalu...