2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-019-01489-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validation Study of the German Version of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
10
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Using ESEM, we were able to replicate the original three-factor structure from Carpenter et al 10 , providing evidence that the SIS/SES-SF measures the same construct postulated by the DCM. While the internal consistency of the scales was somewhat low for men (ie, < .70 for the SIS1 and SIS2), these indices were comparable to those of a previous study 21 . As internal consistency is affected by the number of items in a scale, lower scores are to be expected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using ESEM, we were able to replicate the original three-factor structure from Carpenter et al 10 , providing evidence that the SIS/SES-SF measures the same construct postulated by the DCM. While the internal consistency of the scales was somewhat low for men (ie, < .70 for the SIS1 and SIS2), these indices were comparable to those of a previous study 21 . As internal consistency is affected by the number of items in a scale, lower scores are to be expected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Analysis of measurement invariance showed that only the general structure of the SIS/SES-SF was the same between men and women, meaning that direct comparison of scores of the scales cannot be made. This result is (partly) surprising as Moyano and Sierra 35 reported strict invariance and Rettenberger et al 21 partial scalar invariance. This limited invariance found in our study could be the result of using ESEM, as a more complex data structure (ie, with item cross-loadings) is necessarily harder to replicate in different subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Factorial invariance for gender was also confirmed (Carpenter et al, 2008 ). The German validations (Rettenberger et al, 2019 ), which regarded only the SIS/SES short form (Carpenter et al, 2011 ), showed good psychometric properties and confirmed the original results and factorial invariance for gender. The Finnish validation (Varjonen et al, 2007 ) eliminated nine items for various reasons, confirming the structure of the three superordinate factors (SES, SIS1 and SIS2) but finding 25 lower-order factors instead of the 10 original ones found by the authors (Janssen & Bancroft, 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The SIS/SES in either the original or the short form has been validated in many countries and translated into different languages, such as German (Rettenberger & Briken, 2013 ), Spanish (Moyano & Sierra, 2014 ), Dutch (van Lankveld et al, 2015 ), and many South Asian languages, such as Hindi, Urdu, Panjabi, Tamil, and Sinhalese (Malavige et al, 2013 ). The 14-item short version was recently validated in German (Rettenberger et al, 2019 ; Velten et al, 2018 ), and the 45-item version was validated in Finnish (Varjonen et al, 2007 ), Portuguese (Quinta Gomes et al, 2018 ), and Spanish (Granados et al, 2018 ). The Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory (SESII) for Women (a different instrument developed from focus group analysis, assessing only female systems; Graham et al, 2004 ) has been adapted in Dutch (Bloemendaal & Laan, 2009 ), German (Velten et al, 2018 ), Polish, Portuguese (Neves et al, 2016 ), and Spanish (Granados et al, 2017 ), and the SESII for Men has been adapted in German (Velten et al, 2018 ) and Portuguese (Neves et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%