2017
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation

Abstract: Langley et al. (2017) developed a sex estimation decision tree utilizing two traditional cranial traits (glabella and mastoid) and a new trait: zygomatic extension. This study aimed to test the reliability of their zygomatic extension scoring method and validate their sex estimation method. Ordinal score data were collected from 281 male and female U.S. White and Black individuals. The five traditional cranial traits were collected from physical specimens, while zygomatic extension was scored from 3D cranial m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The posterior probability of 0.73 indicated female sex of the Zlatý kůň skull. As emphasized by Garvin and Klales [ 95 ], the decision tree model produces a strong sex bias, with females correctly classified in 94% and males only in 49% of the test sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The posterior probability of 0.73 indicated female sex of the Zlatý kůň skull. As emphasized by Garvin and Klales [ 95 ], the decision tree model produces a strong sex bias, with females correctly classified in 94% and males only in 49% of the test sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that mastoid volume measures can be valuable in a multi-factorial approach to sex estimation (Garvin and Klales, 2017;Langley et al, 2017), and even used alone if only fragmented parts of the temporal bone are available. The sex estimation accuracy of 70.6 % obtained for the Croatian population using Vol-2 is higher than the classifications achieved using traditional mastoid measurements for some African (Jaja et al, 2013), Brazilian (Galdames et al, 2008), Indian (Sumati et al, 2010), Saudi (Madadin et al, 2015), and white European and American (Bernard, 2008;Kemkes and Gobel, 2006;Spradley and Jantz, 2011) populations, but worse than the classification results achieved for Brazilian (de Paiva and Segre, 2003), other Indian (Gupta et al, 2012), Japanese (Nagaoka et al, 2008), Jordanian (Amin et al, 2015), and Thai (Manoonpol and Plakornkul, 2012;Sujarittham et al, 2011) groups.…”
Section: Sex Estimation Accuracymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Moreover, older individuals were more prone to antemortem tooth loss and edentulous mandibles. However, no data are available so far on the changes of the site of interest (i.e., the mental eminence) in case of tooth loss [ 47 ], and further analyses are needed in the future that use samples that also include young individuals to clarify this statement. Another limitation is represented by the intrinsic subjectivity of the tested method, as it is a method based on morphological features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%