1979
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4306_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validity Scale Sign Calling for Caution in the Interpretation of MMPIs Among Psychiatric Inpatients

Abstract: Three expert MMPI judges classified 100 psychiatric inpatients as psychotic or non-psychotic on the basis of their MMPIs. Validity scale data, as well as clinical scale scores, were included for 50 of the profiles, while the validity scale scores were withheld from the judges for the remaining 50 profiles. Within each of the above two groups, half had a "positive" validity scale sign (a defensive validity scale configuration defined as L or K greater than or equal to 70, or both greater than or equal to 60) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using an inpatient population. Sines, Baucom, and Gruba (1979) reported that judges' knowledge of the validity scale scores in K-corrected profiles did not significantly increase correct classification over profiles where the validity scales and amount of K-correction were withheld.…”
Section: The Traditional Validity Scalesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Using an inpatient population. Sines, Baucom, and Gruba (1979) reported that judges' knowledge of the validity scale scores in K-corrected profiles did not significantly increase correct classification over profiles where the validity scales and amount of K-correction were withheld.…”
Section: The Traditional Validity Scalesmentioning
confidence: 97%