2023
DOI: 10.1007/s43678-023-00481-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A value-based comparison of the management of respiratory diseases in walk-in clinics and emergency departments

Abstract: Objectives Our aim was to compare some of the health outcomes and costs associated with value of care in emergency departments (ED) and walk-in clinics for ambulatory patients presenting with an acute respiratory disease. Methods A health records review was conducted from April 2016 through March 2017 in one ED and one walk-in clinic. Inclusion criteria were: (i) ambulatory patients at least 18 years old, (ii) discharged home with a diagnosis of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), pneumonia, acute asthma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A parallel study following the same methodology was performed concurrently for the adult population and was previously published. 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A parallel study following the same methodology was performed concurrently for the adult population and was previously published. 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parallel study following the same methodology was performed concurrently for the adult population and was previously published. 14 Study setting and design A retrospective cohort study was conducted for the fiscal year 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017 in one ED and one walk-in clinic in Québec city (Canada). The participating ED is a paediatric tertiary care centre where an average of 34 000 children are seen every year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, 2 patient partners met with us regularly and provided helpful comments to make our research plan patient-centered. From previous studies, our team was able to perform life cycle assessment [76][77][78][79][80] and cost-effectiveness [60,61,81,82] measures. This previous work will help with the proposed study.…”
Section: Study Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%