2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15745-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Value-Based Global Code of Conduct to Counter Ethics Dumping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important that researchers discuss this with participants as part of the consent process and respect the desires of the community in this regard. It is often considered best practice for researchers to provide ample time for participants to query and discuss results, either or both in collaborative discussions with the community or private discussions with interested respondents [ 36 38 , 48 ]. Ideally, such community discussions provide the researcher with novel insights into data interpretation while providing participants with a satisfactory understanding of the knowledge generated by the research and an opportunity to engage with the researchers' study motivations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important that researchers discuss this with participants as part of the consent process and respect the desires of the community in this regard. It is often considered best practice for researchers to provide ample time for participants to query and discuss results, either or both in collaborative discussions with the community or private discussions with interested respondents [ 36 38 , 48 ]. Ideally, such community discussions provide the researcher with novel insights into data interpretation while providing participants with a satisfactory understanding of the knowledge generated by the research and an opportunity to engage with the researchers' study motivations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This positive picture of international research collaborations can be undermined by a practice called ethics dumping (European Commission, 2016). Ethics dumping involves the export of research which would be severely restricted or not permitted in HICs to LMICs, where ethical review processes, compliance structures and follow-up mechanisms might not be as well-resourced or supported (Novoa-Heckel et al, 2017; Schroeder et al, 2018, 2019).…”
Section: Ethics Dumpingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important that researchers discuss this with participants as part of the consent process and respect the desires of the community in this regard. It is often considered best practice for researchers to provide ample time for participants to query and discuss results, either or both in collaborative discussions with the community or private discussions with interested respondents (33)(34)(35)45). Ideally, such community discussions provide the researcher with novel insights into data interpretation while providing participants with a satisfactory understanding of the knowledge generated by the research and an opportunity to engage with the researchers' study motivations.…”
Section: Community Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%