A value chain analysis of interventions to control production diseases in the intensive pig production sector

Abstract

Value chain analysis (VCA) calculated the financial effects on food chain actors of interventions to improve animal health and welfare in the intensive pig sector. Two interventions to reduce production diseases were studied. A generic chain diagram of linkages between stakeholders and value-added dimensions was designed. Data on structure and financial performance were collected for the sector. The production parameters and financial effects of the interventions were then described to illustrate impact on the supply chain. The effects of the interventions were also assessed at market level using economic welfare analysis. The sectors in Finland and the UK are small in farm numbers and few companies produced much of the output in a largely vertically-integrated structure. The most beneficial intervention in financial terms to farmers was improved hygiene in pig fattening (around +50% in gross margin). It was calculated to reduce the consumer price for pig meat by up to 5% when applied at large, whereas for improved management measures, it would reduce consumer price by less than 0.5%. However, the latter added value also through food quality attributes. We show that good hygiene and animal care can add value. However, evaluation of the financial and social viability of the interventions is needed to decide what interventions are adopted. The structure of supply chains influences which policy measures could be applied. Of the two interventions, improved pig hygiene had the largest potential to improve efficiency and reduce costs. The studied interventions can also provide new business opportunities to farms, slaughterhouses and food sector companies. More evidence is needed to support public policies and business decision-making in the sector. For this, evidence on consumer attitudes to production diseases is needed. Nevertheless, the study makes an important contribution by showing how improvements in health and welfare benefit the whole chain.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Seven Measures to Reduce Tail Biting Lesions in Fattening Pigs

“…In addition, pig producers' incentives to implement an intervention may be different from the incentives faced by other stakeholders, experts or society [see Ref. ( 92 ) for discussion]. The perceived importance of risk factors (and preferences to control the risk of tail biting) may differ between scientists and pig producers, and between pig producers in different cultures of pig production ( 43 ).…”

Using PRRSV-Resilient Sows Improve Performance in Endemic Infected Farms with Recurrent Outbreaks

“…Moreover, as a proactive prevention measure, compared to reactive disease treatments, resilience is widely accepted amongst consumers [ 37 ]. Breeding for resilience is perceived by the public as a more natural approach than vaccines to control diseases, thereby adding more value to the pig chain [ 38 ].…”

Impacts of African Swine Fever on Pigmeat Markets in Europe

“…The present study did not consider the possibility that ASF would affect consumer preferences. Although this may be highly relevant in the event of some other diseases [such as zoonotic diseases or production diseases; see, e.g., (36) for discussion], in the event of ASF it is unlikely because ASF does not pose a risk to human health.…”