A values‐based process for cross‐cultural dialogue between scientists and Māori

Abstract

Cross-cultural dialogue is an essential part of the evaluation of controversial technologies and research proposals of significance to indigenous peoples. If Māori in Aotearoa/New Zealand are to benefit from these technologies it is important that effective processes are developed and implemented to ensure enduring outcomes for their communities. We describe a deliberate, multi-stage process to facilitate cross-cultural dialogue that starts well before research applications are submitted to funding and/or regulatory agencies. The process begins with provision of "toolkits" to both the research provider and the Māori entities, which allows both to be better prepared to engage in constructive dialogue with each other concerning the proposal and its intended outcomes. The process allows for the evaluation of technologies and modification of research proposals by Māori to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes. It also recognises that non-Māori scientists are often willing to participate but may feel apprehensive because of unfamiliarity with the language, protocols and values. The process suggests the use of a Māori intermediary/ies (MIs) to assist scientists with re-evaluation of their proposals prior to the actual dialogue phase, and facilitate the interaction between the dialogue partners. The process accommodates a range of possible outcomes from the dialogue phase, and subsequent monitoring of outcomes from the research by both parties. We also demonstrate application of the process with a case study based on recent experiences from a field trial of genetically modified Pinus radiata D.Don. It is anticipated that adoption of this values-based process by scientists and scientific organisations will result in the transformation of science praxis, the creation of long-term relationships between scientists and Māori, and mutually beneficial outcomes for both.

Views on clinical trial recruitment, biospecimen collection, and cancer research: population science from landscapes of the Haudenosaunee (People of the Longhouse)

“…This includes Māori involvement at all levels of the research, Māori setting the research agenda, Māori determining the interpretation and dissemination of research outputs, and Māori involvement in governance of samples and data [4–6, 27–29, 35]. Tribal communities in New Zealand have stressed the importance of their involvement in governance of research and biobanking activities due to the level of risk for participants, the cultural importance of tissue, DNA, data, and the need for collaborative relationships to ensure benefits are realized in their communities [12].…”

Indigenous Perspectives and Gene Editing in Aotearoa New Zealand

“…Participants in this study suggested that the effect of gene editing on Māori values is not always in a negative direction and it was suggested that whakapapa, mana, mauri, and kaitiakitanga might be enhanced through the use of gene editing technologies. This suggests that values based frameworks developed for other gene based technologies (Wilcox et al, 2008; Hudson et al, 2016c) will remain relevant in for gene editing applications. What the enhancement or diminishment of these Māori values might look like is summarized in Table 2.…”

Building strong relationships between conservation genetics and primary industry leads to mutually beneficial genomic advances

“…Ko Aotearoa Tēnei/This is New Zealand , conventionally known as WAI 262, http://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/) and various approaches have been developed to facilitate such engagement (Tipene‐Matua & Henaghan ; Wilcox et al . ; Hudson et al . ).…”