2017
DOI: 10.1057/s41283-017-0017-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A VaR assuming Student t distribution not significantly different from a VaR assuming normal distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since volatility estimation is a key input to VaR (value-at-risk) models, the selection of the appropriate volatility model is one of the most important factors in determining the accuracy of VaR. According to the distribution of errors, when the mean return is zero, the 1-day horizon VaR for an individual asset with probability p% can be calculated as follows (Xu, 2017):…”
Section: Value-at-risk Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since volatility estimation is a key input to VaR (value-at-risk) models, the selection of the appropriate volatility model is one of the most important factors in determining the accuracy of VaR. According to the distribution of errors, when the mean return is zero, the 1-day horizon VaR for an individual asset with probability p% can be calculated as follows (Xu, 2017):…”
Section: Value-at-risk Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%