Myosin VI is unique in its directionality among myosin superfamily members and also displays a slow and strain-dependent rate of ATP binding that allows for gating between its heads. In this study we demonstrate that leucine 310 is positioned by a class VI-specific insert, insert-1, so as to account for the selective hindrance of ATP versus ADP binding. Mutation of leucine 310 to glycine removes all influence of insert-1 on ATP binding. Furthermore, by analyzing myosin VI structures with either leucine 310 substituted to a glycine or complete removal of insert-1, we conclude that nucleotides may initially bind to myosin by their purine rings before docking their phosphate moieties. Otherwise, insert-1 could not exert a differential influence on ATP versus ADP binding.Myosin VI is the only myosin superfamily member that has been shown to traffic toward the minus (pointed) end of actin filaments (1). This unique directionality is made possible due to a myosin VI class-specific structural element that is known as insert-2 and enables myosin VI to perform unique cellular functions (2). This insert wraps around the myosin VI converter and binds a calmodulin via an unusual calmodulin binding motif (3). This redirects the lever arm of myosin VI ϳ120°as compared with plus-end-directed myosin motors.Like myosin V, dimeric myosin VI can function as a processive motor on actin (4 -7). That is to say that the dimer can move along actin in a hand-over-hand fashion with steps of 30 -36 nm. As in the case of the plus-end directed processive dimer of myosin Va (8 -11), the processive movement of myosin VI is optimized by "gating" between the heads. Intramolecular strain stalls the lead head until the rear head has detached from actin as the dimer moves along the filament (8 -12). However, the mechanism of how this is accomplished differs between myosin V and VI, necessitated by their opposite directionalities. In the case of myosin V, intramolecular strain greatly decreases the rate of dissociation of MgADP from the lead head (8 -11), whereas in the case of myosin VI, ADP dissociation is unaffected, but ATP binding is greatly slowed on the lead head, preventing its detachment (12). This is illustrated in Fig. 1.Based on the structure of myosin VI (3), it appeared that another myosin VI class-specific insert, insert-1, is responsible for impeding ATP binding. Indeed, even in the absence of strain, binding of ATP to monomeric myosin VI is at least an order of magnitude slower than binding to myosin V (3), and removal of the 26-residue insert increased the rate of ATP binding (3, 12). The mechanism of how this is achieved was not entirely clear, although we postulated that insert-1 positioned the side chain of leucine 310 physically in the way so that it impeded ATP but not ADP entry into the pocket.In this study we examine if positioning of leucine 310 does indeed provide steric hindrance for ATP binding and is in fact the mechanism by which myosin VI gating is achieved. Although we have examined the effects of insert-1 on nucleo...