2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A variable selection method for simultaneous component based data integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method introduced here builds further on extensions of principal component analysis. These include sparse PCA (Zou et al, 2006), simultaneous components with rotation to common and distinctive components (Schouteden et al, 2013), and sparse simultaneous component analysis (Gu & Van Deun, 2016; Van Deun, Wilderjans, van den Berg, Antoniadis, & Van Mechelen, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method introduced here builds further on extensions of principal component analysis. These include sparse PCA (Zou et al, 2006), simultaneous components with rotation to common and distinctive components (Schouteden et al, 2013), and sparse simultaneous component analysis (Gu & Van Deun, 2016; Van Deun, Wilderjans, van den Berg, Antoniadis, & Van Mechelen, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Gu and Van Deun (2016) developed an extension to sparse SCA by penalizing the loading matrix in a componentwise fashion, hence allowing for both common and distinctive components. The main distinguishing characteristic of this paper is that it penalizes the component weights and not the loadings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selecting the proper parameters in a non-simulation study, especially when analysing high-dimensional data, is challenging. As demonstrated by (Gu & Van Deun, 2016), the tuning parameter of l1 -Lasso can successfully be selecting using (Meinshausen & Bühlmann, 2010)'s resample-based stability selection method, although the multi-component structure of both (Gu & Van Deun, 2016)'s and our work complicates matters further.…”
Section: Selection Status Recoverymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To single out the cross-source relations, we need to disentangle the common sources of variation shared between the different data blocks (with each block containing the data or variables of one source) from the sources of variation that are specific for a single or a few data blocks only. To do this, we perform a so called sparse DIStinctive and COmmon Simultaneus Component Analysis decomposition of the data (sparse DISCO SCA; see (Gu & Van Deun, 2016, 2017), a method that was developed for the integrated analysis of multi-source data with the specific aim of separating block-specific sources of variation from common sources of variation. Sparse DISCO SCA models common and specific components by using specific constraints on the loadings of each of the components in Λ.…”
Section: Isolating the Cross-source Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article introduces an R package for performing joint analysis on large-scale multiblock data from multiple sources. The core algorithms of this package have their roots in traditional simultaneous component analysis (SCA), which has been widely used for performing data integration from multiple sources in biomedical research, bioinformatics, genomics, and psychology (e.g., De Tayrac, Lê, Aubry, Mosser, & Husson, 2009; Gu & Van Deun, 2016; Lock, Hoadley, Marron, & Nobel, 2013; Van Deun, Smilde, van der Werf, Kiers, & Van Mechelen, 2009; Van Deun et al, 2012: Van Deun, Smilde, Thorrez, Kiers, & Van Mechelen, 2013; Wilderjans, Ceulemans, Van Mechelen, & van den Berg, 2011). One may notice that, aside from SCA, other methods, such as canonical correlation analysis (Tenenhaus & Tenenhaus, 2014), may also be used for joint analysis of multiblock data, but we refrain from discussing other methods in this article.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%