Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is used for treatment of hemophilia patients with inhibitors, as well for off-label treatment of severe bleeding in trauma and surgery. Effective bleeding control requires supraphysiological doses of rFVIIa, posing both high expense and uncertain thrombotic risk. Two major competing theories offer different explanations for the supraphysiological rFVIIa dosing requirement: (1) the need to overcome competition between FVIIa and FVII zymogen for tissue factor (TF) binding, and (2) a highdose-requiring phospholipid-related pathway of FVIIa action. In the present study, we found experimental conditions in which both mechanisms contribute simultaneously and independently to rFVIIa-driven thrombin generation in FVIIdeficient human plasma. From mathematical simulations of our model of FX activation, which were confirmed by thrombingeneration experiments, we conclude that the action of rFVIIa at pharmacologic doses is dominated by the TF-dependent pathway with a minor contribution from a phospholipid-dependent mechanism. We established a dose-response curve for rFVIIa that is useful to explain dosing strategies. In the present study, we present a pathway to reconcile the 2 major mechanisms of rFVIIa action, a necessary step to understanding future dose optimization and evaluation of new rFVIIa analogs currently under development.
IntroductionThe use of a recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) product, NovoSeven, which is licensed for the treatment of hemophilia patients with inhibitory Abs against factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX), has proven to be safe and efficacious, but its dosing remains problematic. [1][2][3][4] The recommended dosing schedule is a supraphysiological dose of 90 g/kg every 2-3 hours until hemostasis is achieved, producing an approximately 250-fold increase above basal plasma concentrations of FVIIa (0.1 to 25nM). 5 Not only does such a treatment regimen incur a high cost, but ineffective drug responses and thrombotic complications have also been reported. [6][7][8][9] However, our current understanding of the mechanism of rFVIIa action is unclear, limiting our ability to optimize the safety and cost of treatment. 10,11 Off-label use of rFVIIa for nonhemophilia patients at similar high doses indicates that the high dose required for hemophilia treatment cannot be explained by deficiencies of FVIII or FIX alone. 5,12 FVIIa is a weak enzyme and its activity requires either of 2 cofactors, tissue factor (TF) or negatively charged phospholipids. 13 Disagreement over which of the 2 cofactors explains the high pharmacologic dose of the drug has led to TF-and phospholipiddependent theories of rFVIIa action. Although these mechanisms may appear to be nonexclusive, the 2 theories support opposing approaches to dose adjustment.The TF-dependent mechanism suggests that the hemostatic effect of rFVIIa is mediated by its binding to TF expressed on cell surfaces at the site of injury, 14 forming the extrinsic tenase complex, which activates factor X (FX), leading to thrombin genera...