The “fixed
diagonal matrices” (FDM) dispersion formalism
[
30865464
J.
Phys. Chem. Lett.
2019
10
1537
] is based on a supramolecular wave function
constrained to leave the diagonal of the many-body density matrix
of each monomer unchanged, reducing dispersion to a balance between
kinetic energy and monomer–monomer interaction. The corresponding
variational optimization leads to expressions for the dispersion energy
in terms of the ground-state pair densities of the isolated monomers
only, providing a framework to build new approximations without the
need for polarizabilities or virtual orbitals. Despite the underlying
microscopic real space mechanism being incorrect, as in the exact
case there is density relaxation, the formalism has been shown to
give extremely accurate (or even exact) dispersion coefficients for
H and He. The question we answer in this work is how accurate the
FDM expressions can be for isotropic and anisotropic
C
6
dispersion coefficients when monomer pair densities
are used from different levels of theory, namely Hartree–Fock,
MP2, and CCSD. For closed-shell systems, FDM with CCSD monomer pair
densities yield a mean average percent error for isotropic
C
6
dispersion coefficients of about 7% and a
maximum absolute error within 18%, with a similar accuracy for anisotropies.
The performance for open-shell systems is less satisfactory, with
CCSD pair densities performing sometimes worse than Hartree–Fock
or MP2. In the present implementation, the computational cost on top
of the monomer’s ground-state calculations is
O
(
N
4
). The results show little sensitivity
to the basis set used in the monomer’s calculations.