2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A variational constitutive model for soft biological tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…is expected to be strongly non-convex (Ogden et al, 2004) and well suited for genetic algorithms (Schmitt, 2004;El Sayed et al, 2008). We employ the Breeder Genetic Algorithm (BGA) presented in De Falco et al (1996) and successfully used as a parameter identification tool in Fraternali et al (2010).…”
Section: Section 52 Fitting Of Experimental Results On Compressed Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is expected to be strongly non-convex (Ogden et al, 2004) and well suited for genetic algorithms (Schmitt, 2004;El Sayed et al, 2008). We employ the Breeder Genetic Algorithm (BGA) presented in De Falco et al (1996) and successfully used as a parameter identification tool in Fraternali et al (2010).…”
Section: Section 52 Fitting Of Experimental Results On Compressed Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim was to characterize the influence of these fibers on the surface instability and folding. Each layer of tissue was modeled as a compressible neoHookean material, although our computational formulation extends easily to more sophisticated tissue models [9]. Throughout this study we have ignored both plastic deformation and viscoelastic relaxation of the tissue since the measured relaxation times for soft tissue (seconds) are typically much faster than the timescale of growth (weeks/months).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when studying soft tissue properties, elastoplastic responses and viscoelastic mechanisms, authors suggest different mechanical intrinsic properties of three cranial structures: gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and brain stem with corpus callosum (BSCC). [6] Thus, data offered for the long-term shear modulus (elastoplastic response) are 6.80 kPa for GM, 8.20 kPa for WM and 11.60 kPa for BSCC. [6] The same source also offers different figures for the initial shear modulus for all three of these rather schematic divisions of the central nervous system, which might correspond, in an approximate form, to the cortex (GM), to the corona radiata, with the subcortical and periventricular areas (WM), and to the central-midline structures (BSCC).…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Thus, data offered for the long-term shear modulus (elastoplastic response) are 6.80 kPa for GM, 8.20 kPa for WM and 11.60 kPa for BSCC. [6] The same source also offers different figures for the initial shear modulus for all three of these rather schematic divisions of the central nervous system, which might correspond, in an approximate form, to the cortex (GM), to the corona radiata, with the subcortical and periventricular areas (WM), and to the central-midline structures (BSCC). Thus, albeit authors generally agree that the brain and spinal cord move as a unit when exposed to a sagittal rotational acceleration of the head and neck, [7] our case suggests that a different momentum might exist, mainly during the deceleration that follows the abrupt cessation of an angular head motion, creating an important shear factor between the cortical-external structures and the BSCC on the other side.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%