2022
DOI: 10.22331/q-2022-06-07-730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A variational quantum algorithm for the Feynman-Kac formula

Abstract: We propose an algorithm based on variational quantum imaginary time evolution for solving the Feynman-Kac partial differential equation resulting from a multidimensional system of stochastic differential equations. We utilize the correspondence between the Feynman-Kac partial differential equation (PDE) and the Wick-rotated Schrödinger equation for this purpose. The results for a (2+1) dimensional Feynman-Kac system obtained through the variational quantum algorithm are then compared against classical ODE solv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such decomposition can be obtained in a similar way to Ref. [22,41] and is shown in Appendix B. F can be represented as a sum of O(d 2 n 4 ) unitaries each of which requires at most O(n 2 ) gates to be implemented. G for typical boundary conditions discussed in Sec.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Such decomposition can be obtained in a similar way to Ref. [22,41] and is shown in Appendix B. F can be represented as a sum of O(d 2 n 4 ) unitaries each of which requires at most O(n 2 ) gates to be implemented. G for typical boundary conditions discussed in Sec.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [13,14,22] solve the discretized Schrödinger equation by VQS, which is a variational quantum algorithm for solving ODEs. In the previous studies mentioned above, the time complexity required to solve the BSPDE depends on the grid points only logarithmically.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations