2009
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/103045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A versatile fabrication method for cluster superlattices

Abstract: On the graphene moiré on Ir(111) a variety of highly perfect cluster superlattices can be grown as shown is for Ir, Pt, W, and Re. Even materials that do not form cluster superlattices upon room temperature deposition may be grown into such by low temperature deposition or the application of cluster seeding through Ir as shown for Au, AuIr, FeIr. Criteria for the suitability of a material to form a superlattice are given and largely confirmed. It is proven that at least Pt and Ir even form epitaxial cluster su… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
250
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
19
250
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, regular arrays of NCs were successfully assembled using surfaces such as alumina double layers on Ni 3 Al [2,3], vicinal Au(111) surfaces [4,5], reconstructed surfaces [6,7] or h-BN nanomesh [8,9]. Recently, graphene Moiré on close-packed metal surfaces like Pt(111) [10], Rh(111) [11], Ru(0001) [12,13], and Ir(111) [14,15] has been suggested to be a good candidate for the templated growth of clusters arrays. Recent works demonstrate that superlattices of metallic clusters of Re, W, Pt, and Ir on such graphene…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, regular arrays of NCs were successfully assembled using surfaces such as alumina double layers on Ni 3 Al [2,3], vicinal Au(111) surfaces [4,5], reconstructed surfaces [6,7] or h-BN nanomesh [8,9]. Recently, graphene Moiré on close-packed metal surfaces like Pt(111) [10], Rh(111) [11], Ru(0001) [12,13], and Ir(111) [14,15] has been suggested to be a good candidate for the templated growth of clusters arrays. Recent works demonstrate that superlattices of metallic clusters of Re, W, Pt, and Ir on such graphene…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is confirmed by the measured radial distribution, where the peak at about 25 Å (the distance between nearest-neighboring preferential adsorption sites) decreases for the lower coverage case and not for the high coverage one. Therefore, the observed cluster density decrease is due to wholecluster diffusion/coalescence processes, as observed in the case of Ir clusters on the GR/Ir(111) interface, 13 rather than to the energetically hindered atomic detachment from the clusters. As the cluster mobility is enhanced by further annealing, the superlattice periodicity gets lost: large clusters composed by a few hundred atoms appear in the high coverage case, and the average distance between clusters increases (see Figure 1f).…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, PIM can be applied directly to elucidate and interpret behavior in a host of specific systems, some of which are indicated above. An expanded list of examples includes: (a) homogenous nucleation and growth of metal NCs during deposition on metal, semiconductor, oxide substrates [8,9], with particular utility for Volmer-Weber growth of 3D islands on weakly binding substrates; (b) nucleation inhibited by attachment barriers as observed in metal (111) homoepitaxial systems which exhibit enhanced long-range adatom interactions with a "repulsive ring" due to surface states [38,49]; inhibited attachment was also recently suggested for Fe deposition on graphene [50]; (c) nucleation and growth with strongly anisotropic diffusion as observed for homoepitaxy on dimer-row reconstructed Si(100) surfaces [51]; (d) significant effects on nucleation of small mobile clusters as anticipated for homoepitaxy on metal (100) and (111) surfaces [52]; (e) growth inhibition in strained-layer heteroepitaxy with large mismatch [53]; (f) codeposition to form bimetallic NCs, e.g., of Pt and Au on TiO 2(110) [43], and Pt and Ru on graphene [44]; (g) exchange-mediated nucleation in Fe on Cu(100) [41], and Ni on Ag(111) [42] systems; (h) nucleation of metal NCs on graphite is often facilitated by sputtering to create surface damage and heterogeneous nucleation centers, but even a small fraction of Cu ions from an e-beam evaporator can create sufficient damage that heterogeneous nucleation dominates for Cu deposition on HOPG [46]; (i) deposition of metals on metal-supported graphene, with periodically rumpled morié structure due to lattice mismatch, often results in directed-assembly of 3D NCs [54], and the PIM framework is ideally suited to modeling of this complex process [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%