2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.08.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A versatile model for the prediction of complex geometry in 3D direct laser deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the perspective of geometric control, the development of a high-accuracy process model on the smallest processing unit (e.g., single cold spray track) offers a promising solution to the aforementioned problem since an aggregate of single tracks determines final part geometry. Furthermore, such a single-track model often plays a key role in the modelling of higher processing unit (i.e., overlapping and overlayer models) in the literature [25,29]. Previous studies of the single-track modelling fell into two main approaches: mathematical and data-driven modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of geometric control, the development of a high-accuracy process model on the smallest processing unit (e.g., single cold spray track) offers a promising solution to the aforementioned problem since an aggregate of single tracks determines final part geometry. Furthermore, such a single-track model often plays a key role in the modelling of higher processing unit (i.e., overlapping and overlayer models) in the literature [25,29]. Previous studies of the single-track modelling fell into two main approaches: mathematical and data-driven modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the last clad presents a sharp curve from the top to the substrate. Both of the situations generate a lack of material and a distortion at the edges (Figure 6a), which increases at higher numbers of layers, as shown by Nenadl et al [30]. Thus, one possible solution to compensate for this absence of material is to add extra clads at the edges of the layer.…”
Section: = × + ×mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In this paper, prediction of the part height of the DED build is computed by adding up the melt-pool height over all deposited layers, by ignoring any possible overlap of melt-pool height across two adjacent layers. For laser clad depositions, a two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional model was developed in [ 35 ] to predict the relative coating height in multi-track, multi-layer depositions as a function of hatch overlap ratio, where the relative coating height was defined as the height of the coating measured from the substrate normalized by the height of an individual track. The hatch overlap ratio is defined as with w denoting the melt-pool width and denoting the hatch spacing between two individual tracks.…”
Section: Dynamic Model On Melt-pool Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hatch overlap ratio is defined as with w denoting the melt-pool width and denoting the hatch spacing between two individual tracks. It was shown that for the overlap ratio of , the relative coating height for 2 layers, 4 layers, and 6 layers was approximately 2, 4, and 6, respectively (see Figure 3 of [ 35 ]). The model prediction was validated by experimental measurements from depositions of multi-track multi-layer of stainless steel when the effect of thermal history was negligible due to a sufficient long inter-layer dwell time (enough time given to the first layer to cool down before applying the second layer) (see Figure 10 of [ 35 ]).…”
Section: Dynamic Model On Melt-pool Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation