Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453)
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2003.1249323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A view-based outdoor navigation using object recognition robust to changes of weather and seasons

Abstract: This paper describes a view-based outdoor navigation method. In the method, a userfirsf guides a robot along a mute. During this guided movement, the robot learns a sequence of images and a rough geometry of the route. The mbot then moves autonomously along the mute with localizing itselJ based on the comparison behveen the leamed images and input images. Since appearances of objects in images may vary much according to changes of seasons and weather in outdoor scenes, a simple image comparison does nof work. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the interpretation of changing environmental conditions can pose serious challenges for computer vision processes, such as those associated with place recognition, navigation, road/terrain detection, and scene exploration. [19][20][21][22][23][24] This is because rain, snow, and fog weather events, smoke, haze, or other changes in lighting and visibility can significantly obscure features, degrade object recognition, and modify the saliency and image context of an outdoor scene. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Naturally, scene-depicted environmental conditions can vary with time of day, season, and location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the interpretation of changing environmental conditions can pose serious challenges for computer vision processes, such as those associated with place recognition, navigation, road/terrain detection, and scene exploration. [19][20][21][22][23][24] This is because rain, snow, and fog weather events, smoke, haze, or other changes in lighting and visibility can significantly obscure features, degrade object recognition, and modify the saliency and image context of an outdoor scene. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Naturally, scene-depicted environmental conditions can vary with time of day, season, and location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples of local features are Kernel PCA features [18] and Harris corners [19]. Some systems [20], [21] extend their scope of locality by matching image regions to recognize a location. At this level of representation, the major hurdle lies in achieving reliable segmentation and in robustly characterizing individual regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…st , p r j ) < th dist (6) where dist represents the euclidean distance and th dist is fixed to 5 pixels.…”
Section: B) Matching Of the Feature-pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors prefer identifying vertical edges which are precisely referenced in GIS ( [2], [5]). Another way consists on the update of the current view with a set of images, recorded and geo-referenced during a calibration phase ( [6], [11]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%