Stimuli-responsive ruthenium complexes proximal- and distal-[Ru(C10tpy)(C10pyqu) OH2]2+ (proximal-1 and distal-1; C10tpy = 4′-decyloxy-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine
and C10pyqu = 2-[2′-(6′-decyloxy)-pyridyl]quinoline)
were experimentally studied for adduct formation with a model DNA
base. At 303 K, proximal-1 exhibited
1:1 adduct formation with 9-ethylguanine (9-EtG) to yield proximal-[Ru(C10tpy)(C10pyqu)(9-EtG)]2+ (proximal-RuEtG). Rotation
of the guanine ligand on the ruthenium center was sterically hindered
by the presence of an adjacent quinoline moiety at 303 K. Results
from 1H NMR measurements indicated that photoirradiation
of a proximal-RuEtG solution caused
photoisomerization to distal-RuEtG,
whereas heating of proximal-RuEtG caused
ligand substitution to proximal-1. The
distal isomer of the aqua complex, distal-1, was observed to slowly revert to proximal-1 at 303 K. In the presence of 9-EtG, distal-1 underwent thermal back-isomerization to proximal-1 and adduct formation to distal-RuEtG. Kinetic analysis of 1H NMR measurements
showed that adduct formation between proximal-1 and 9-EtG was 8-fold faster than that between distal-1 and 9-EtG. This difference may be attributed to intramolecular
hydrogen bonding and steric repulsion between the aqua ligand and
the pendant moiety of the bidentate ligand..