Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Appl 1998
DOI: 10.1109/iros.1998.724894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A visual attention network for a humanoid robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the first implementations, named FeatureGate, used an artificial neural network that operated on 2D feature maps (Driscoll et al, 1998), specifically -in the tests presented in the paper -feature maps derived from synthetic images. In its handling of how the features were weighted, it allowed changes depending on the task, that is, top-down attention was partially established.…”
Section: Attention Models In Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first implementations, named FeatureGate, used an artificial neural network that operated on 2D feature maps (Driscoll et al, 1998), specifically -in the tests presented in the paper -feature maps derived from synthetic images. In its handling of how the features were weighted, it allowed changes depending on the task, that is, top-down attention was partially established.…”
Section: Attention Models In Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual attention with robot vision heads has also been explored extensively (e.g., Braun, 1994;Driscoll et al, 1998;Breazeal et al, 2001;Shibata et al, 2001;), but it is just recently that a rather comprehensive visual attention system for technical applications was derived from insight from neurobiology (Koch and Ullman, 1985;Itti and Koch, 2000a;Itti and Koch, 2000b;Itti and Koch, 2001;Itti et al, 2003). This work is currently on its way to explore how intention (i.e., top-down task relevant biases) can influence attention and decision making (Navalpakkam and Itti, 2005;Carmi and Itti, 2006).…”
Section: Attention and Shared Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input to the motor system is the desired eye position, which is continuously compared to an efference copy of the internal representation of the eye position. Many computational models of preattentive processing have been influenced by the feature integration theory (Treisman and Gelade, 1980), which resulted in several technical implementations, e. g. (Itti et al, 1998), including some implementations on humanoid robots (Driscoll et al, 1998;Breazeal and Scasselatti, 1999;Stasse et al, 2000;Vijayakumar et , 2001). With the exception of (Driscoll et al, 1998), these implementations are mainly concerned with bottom-up, data-driven processing directed towards the generation of saliency maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many computational models of preattentive processing have been influenced by the feature integration theory (Treisman and Gelade, 1980), which resulted in several technical implementations, e. g. (Itti et al, 1998), including some implementations on humanoid robots (Driscoll et al, 1998;Breazeal and Scasselatti, 1999;Stasse et al, 2000;Vijayakumar et , 2001). With the exception of (Driscoll et al, 1998), these implementations are mainly concerned with bottom-up, data-driven processing directed towards the generation of saliency maps. However, many theories of visual search, e. g. guided search, suggests that there are several ways for preattentive processing to guide the deployment of attention (Wolfe, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%