2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-019-00632-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Visual Comparison Method and Similarity Measure for Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets and Their Applications in Multi-criteria Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove the practicability and effectiveness of our method, we will compare it with other approaches 3,14,42 …”
Section: Illustrative Example and Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To prove the practicability and effectiveness of our method, we will compare it with other approaches 3,14,42 …”
Section: Illustrative Example and Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Reference [14], the probabilistic linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information is investigated. And Xian et al 42 proposed a visual comparison method and the similarity measure for PLTSs in multicriteria decision making. It should be noted that the expression method of evaluation information in Reference [14] is inconsistent with that in this paper.…”
Section: Illustrative Example and Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 3. Utilize Equations (16) and (17) to compute the deviation degrees between each alternative and the PIS L(p) * and NIS L(p) # , respectively: (17) Step 4. Derive the closeness index CI(x i ) of each alternative x i ∈ X(i = 1, 2, • • • , 4):…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars also extended some classic decision-making methods to PLTS situations, and explored their usefulness in decision making areas [1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Several scholars have successfully explored the application of the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) in the PLTS environment [1,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gou and Xu 21 and Liao et al 22 studied the operational rules of PLTSs, respectively. Bai et al 23 and Xian et al 24 successively used a new possibility degree formula and a visual method to rank PLTSs. Scholars also combined PLTSs with a variety of decision methods and proposed new decision methods, including the TOPSIS method, 20 the MULTIMOORA method, 25,26 the PROMETHEE II method, 27 the ELECTRE II method, 28 the TODIM method, 29 the correlation coefficient method, 30 and the deviation method 31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%