2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A visual editing tool supporting the production of 3D interactive graphics assets for public exhibitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) DIAGRAM-BASED TOOLS Tools using the diagram-based approach empower users to construct a program by connecting together visual components where the output of a component serves as a data input to another component. In some tools such as [41], the visual components may represent data sets and algorithms, whereas in other tools such as [42], the visual components simply represent graphical components. Further, the user can configure these services by setting its properties.…”
Section: ) Form-based Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2) DIAGRAM-BASED TOOLS Tools using the diagram-based approach empower users to construct a program by connecting together visual components where the output of a component serves as a data input to another component. In some tools such as [41], the visual components may represent data sets and algorithms, whereas in other tools such as [42], the visual components simply represent graphical components. Further, the user can configure these services by setting its properties.…”
Section: ) Form-based Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example of a diagram-based approach is described in [42]. End users design 3D interactive graphics by dragging and dropping blocks to the tool environment.…”
Section: ) Form-based Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The user is asked to sort these factors, then to rate each of them in a 3-scale table, and the final evaluation is derived through a conversion table that provides the relationship between the 1-3 scale table and the final score. NASA-TLX (Hart, 2006;Hart and Staveland, 1988) is another widely accepted subjective workload evaluation method applied in the computer-human interface field (Cannavò et al, 2020;Ma and Kaber, 2006). Based on a multi-dimensional rating procedure, NASA-TLX obtains an overall workload score according to a weighted average of ratings on six criteria: Mental Demand (MD), Physical demand (PD), Temporal Demand (TD), Performance (Pe), Effort (Ef) and Frustration (Fr).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%