2013 18th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icdsp.2013.6622789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A visual sensor network for object recognition: Testbed realization

Abstract: Abstract-This work describes the implementation of an object recognition service on top of energy and resourceconstrained hardware. A complete pipeline for object recognition based on the BRISK visual features is implemented on Intel Imote2 sensor devices. The reference implementation is used to assess the performance of the object recognition pipeline in terms of processing time and recognition accuracy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For BRISK we consider 4 octave and 4 intra-octave layers. We performed the interest point detection and feature extraction using BRISK and using SURF on a desktop computer, but SURF and BRISK implementations for battery powered sensor platforms with limited memory exist [16], [25], and since the algorithms are deterministic, they would produce the same results on a VSN node.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For BRISK we consider 4 octave and 4 intra-octave layers. We performed the interest point detection and feature extraction using BRISK and using SURF on a desktop computer, but SURF and BRISK implementations for battery powered sensor platforms with limited memory exist [16], [25], and since the algorithms are deterministic, they would produce the same results on a VSN node.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated in [20], [25], the time needed for interest point detection and for feature extraction are linear functions of the image size (in pixels) and of the number of interest points found in the image, both for SURF and for BRISK, on various hardware platforms. Furthermore, since SURF and BRISK descriptors have a fixed size, the number of interest points also influences the amount of data to be transmitted to the server node .…”
Section: Vsn Workload: Number Of Interest Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of interest points detected; this model was validated recently in [1,2]. We can thus model the detection time for slice v from sensor s at processing node n as a function of the image slice width y i s,v and of the number ξ i s,v of interest points detected in the image slice as an affine function P n (y i s,v + α f ξ i s,v ), where P n is the per unit processing time of node n. Note that ξ i s,v is unknown before processing image slice v, but efficient low-complexity predictors exist, such as the last value predictor [2].…”
Section: Visual Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As shown in [1], significant delay is incurred both when processing is performed at the sensor nodes, and when images are transmitted across the network to a central processing node. Transmitting the images across the network may also drain the energy resources of nodes relaying the images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, * Matteo Cesana is also with MobiMesh srl (Spin-off Politecnico di Milano) extracting features from visual data is often a computationallyintensive task [1]. For the case of local features, this process entails detecting image keypoints and computing the corresponding descriptors, a process whose computational complexity grows linearly with the image size and with the number of scales of the image which are processed 1 [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%