2015
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/49/495203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A volume averaged global model study of the influence of the electron energy distribution and the wall material on an oxygen discharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface interactions are known to be important production and loss channels of RS and energy in low-temperature plasmas produced at low pressure [23][24][25][26]. However, the role of surface interactions in APPs is less well known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface interactions are known to be important production and loss channels of RS and energy in low-temperature plasmas produced at low pressure [23][24][25][26]. However, the role of surface interactions in APPs is less well known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, limitations may be imposed based on assumptions regarding the EEDF, which cannot be obtained selfconsistently in global models, but can have a significant effect on the solution they produce. [109][110][111][112] A realistic representation of the EEDF can be obtained under highly collisional conditions where the electrons can be assumed to be in equilibrium with the local reduced electric field using a two-term-approximation Boltzmann equation solver such as Bolsigþ. [28] The pressure at which this assumption is valid is dependent upon the details of the electron impact cross sections for the gas to be modeled.…”
Section: Limitations and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major contributions to the modelling of low pressure non-thermal oxygen plasmas have been made by, among others, the groups at Lisbon (Guerra and Loureiro 1995, 1999, Marinov et al 2013, Berkeley (Lee et al 1994, Lee andLieberman 1995), Reykjavík (Gudmundsson et al 2001, Gudmundsson 2004, Toneli et al 2015a, Toneli et al 2015b and different teams in Moscow (Ivanov et al 2003, Ionin et al 2007, Mankelevich et al 2016. An important approximation is related to the shape of the electron energy distribution function (EEDF) in these models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%