Wave Propagation in Materials for Modern Applications 2010
DOI: 10.5772/6843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Volume Integral Equation Method for the Direct/Inverse Problem in Elastic Wave Scattering Phenomena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the porous media acoustics context (notably for applications dealing with the absorption of airborne sound) it has been found [100] that the effective (bulk) density of typical air-saturated porous materials can be complex, dispersive, and quite different (real part) from the density of air. Sometimes, theoretical studies of scattering are undertaken in a quite general setting (i.e., without assuming constant mass density), but the mass density is taken to be either continuously-varying [90] or constant in the final, numerical stage [32]. The reason for the latter assumption is (as was suggested in the preceding lines) that it is not easy to carry out the numerical calculations via the DI formulation when the mass density is not constant in Ω.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the porous media acoustics context (notably for applications dealing with the absorption of airborne sound) it has been found [100] that the effective (bulk) density of typical air-saturated porous materials can be complex, dispersive, and quite different (real part) from the density of air. Sometimes, theoretical studies of scattering are undertaken in a quite general setting (i.e., without assuming constant mass density), but the mass density is taken to be either continuously-varying [90] or constant in the final, numerical stage [32]. The reason for the latter assumption is (as was suggested in the preceding lines) that it is not easy to carry out the numerical calculations via the DI formulation when the mass density is not constant in Ω.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such simple models are often the outcome of certain assumptions and approximations in what is called the domain integral formulation (treated in depth in [94]) of the forward-scattering problem. These assumptions usually have to do with: 1) treating an elastic wave problem (in a solid or porous medium) as an acoustic wave problem [13,27,41,34,42,8] (in a so-called equivalent fluid), 2) treating a microscopically-inhomogeneous (e.g., porous) medium as a macroscopically-homogeneous (effective) medium [7,18,17,19,5,58,93], 3) treating the bioacoustic, marine acoustic, electromagnetic and geophysical problem as one in which the mass density, or another constitutive property, is constant everywhere (i.e., is the same and spatially-constant within the obstacle as well as in the host) [65,30,64,73,22,23,45,74,66,27,84,55,52,15,34,96,7,29,57,5,78,36,37,86,96], 4) treating a 3D problem as a 2.5D, 2D or even 1D problem [72,24,94] (and many other references) 5) treating the potato as a sphere...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%