2009
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A volume-of-fluid method for incompressible free surface flows

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper proposes a hybrid volume-of-fluid (VOF) level-set method for simulating incompressible twophase flows. Motion of the free surface is represented by a VOF algorithm that uses high resolution differencing schemes to algebraically preserve both the sharpness of interface and the boundedness of volume fraction. The VOF method is specifically based on a simple order high resolution scheme lower than that of a comparable method, but still leading to a nearly equivalent order of accuracy. Retaining … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 presents the time histories of the total height of water at the two locations: (a) x 1 = 2.228 m and (b) x 2 = 2.725 m. The variations between prediction and experimental results may be associated with wave overturning and merging which are very complicated physical phenomena to model as well as compressibility and viscosity. Similar discrepancies between measured data and numerical modelling results are observed in alternative numerical approaches such as VOF, level set and SPH methods (see, for example, Colagrossi and Landrini [23], Abdolmaleki et al [24], Ferrari et al [25], Park et al [26]). Such a comment assumes the experimental data are error free.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Water Wave Impactsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Figure 7 presents the time histories of the total height of water at the two locations: (a) x 1 = 2.228 m and (b) x 2 = 2.725 m. The variations between prediction and experimental results may be associated with wave overturning and merging which are very complicated physical phenomena to model as well as compressibility and viscosity. Similar discrepancies between measured data and numerical modelling results are observed in alternative numerical approaches such as VOF, level set and SPH methods (see, for example, Colagrossi and Landrini [23], Abdolmaleki et al [24], Ferrari et al [25], Park et al [26]). Such a comment assumes the experimental data are error free.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Water Wave Impactsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The VOF method was typically related to finite difference methods (FDM) [105,167] and finite volume methods (FVM) [96,113,121,165]. Nevertheless, it is also extensively used in the context of finite element method (FEM) [9,41,74,119,134,147,231].…”
Section: Fixed Discretization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid approach was introduced by Williams [10], using the first derivative of a convolution kernel to evaluate the interface normals and a finite-difference method to calculate the curvature from the interface normals. Recent efforts to find more accurate ways to determine the interface curvature have mainly focused on VOF methods with height functions (HF) [6,9,[12][13][14][15] and coupled VOF-LS methods [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Nomenclaturẽmentioning
confidence: 99%