1981
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90306-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A washable macromolecule from Fv2rr marrow negatively regulates DNA synthesis in erythropoietic progenitor cells BFU-E

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because gp55 is not a component of virions (5), it is unlikely that these mutations could alter the efficiency of cell infection. (iii) BFU-E in uninfected congenic Fv-2r strain mice are less actively engaged in mitotic cycling than BFU-E in Fv-2s mice (33)(34)(35). Because Epo is the prime regulator of mitosis in these uninfected erythroblasts, these results are consistent with our suggestion that the Epo response pathway is downmodulated in the resistant mice.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because gp55 is not a component of virions (5), it is unlikely that these mutations could alter the efficiency of cell infection. (iii) BFU-E in uninfected congenic Fv-2r strain mice are less actively engaged in mitotic cycling than BFU-E in Fv-2s mice (33)(34)(35). Because Epo is the prime regulator of mitosis in these uninfected erythroblasts, these results are consistent with our suggestion that the Epo response pathway is downmodulated in the resistant mice.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Because Epo is the prime regulator of mitosis in these uninfected erythroblasts, these results are consistent with our suggestion that the Epo response pathway is downmodulated in the resistant mice. Other evidence using chimeric mice suggests that BFU-E from Fv-2r strains are inherently less responsive to SFFV-induced mitogenesis than Fv-2s BFU-E (32,36), perhaps due to a mitotic inhibitor on the cell surfaces (34,35).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive washing of marrow cells from C57BL/6 mice with DMEM [a procedure which removes the negative cell cycle regulator described by Axelrad et al (1981)] before Friend virus infection and culturing in vitro did not result in virus-induced erythroid burst formation. It was reasoned that perhaps in C57BL/6 marrow, very few erythroid precursors are normally at the developmental stage of the mature burst-forming unit erythroid (BFU-e) which is the main target of the virus in vitro (Kost et al, 1981).…”
Section: Role Of the Fv-2 Gene And Of Erythroid Burst-promoting Activmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such burst-promoting activity (BPA) may be insufficiently produced or have insufficient effect in marrow cell cultures of Fv-2 rr mice. Alternatively, a soluble macromolecule that suppresses the passage of BFU-e through the cell cycle and presumably affects their progression through the erythroid differentiation pathway has been described in Fv-Y r mice (Axelrad et al, 1981). This suppressor substance may somehow prevent the erythroproliferative effects of Friend virus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several hematopoietic inhibitors have been reported, such as stem cell inhibitor (MIP-1α) (Graham et al, 1990;Lord et al, 1976;Wolpe and Cerami, 1989), lactoferrin (Broxmeyer et al, 1984), TGF-β (de Larco and Todaro, 1978;Holley et al, 1980;Tucker et al, 1984), inhibitors of erythroid and granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (Axelrad et al, 1981;Broxmeyer et al, 1981;Broxmeyer et al, 1986), IL-1 inhibitors (Carter et al, 1990;Hannum et al, 1990), and inhibitor of IL-3 dependent cells (Lenfant et al, 1989;Pluthero et al, 1990). Yoshida and Seki (Yoshida and Seki, 1985) induced T cell leukemia, L8313, in mice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%