2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0489-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A water-centred framework to assess the effects of salinity on the growth and yield of wheat and barley

Abstract: We used a water-centred framework (yield = transpiration × transpiration efficiency × harvest index) to investigate the effect of soil salinity on growth and yield of wheat and barley. Our working hypothesis is that salinity reduces transpiration proportionally more than transpiration efficiency. We established a glasshouse experiment with the factorial combination of four varieties (wheat: Janz, Krichauff; barley: Mundah, Keel) and three soil treatments: a control with no NaCl added, and NaCl added to achieve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
47
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2a,b). These results are consistent with a previous study of wheat and barley under saline conditions19. Notably, the aus panel had a greater average decrease for TR in all four intervals when compared with indica (Supplementary Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2a,b). These results are consistent with a previous study of wheat and barley under saline conditions19. Notably, the aus panel had a greater average decrease for TR in all four intervals when compared with indica (Supplementary Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3). Salinity reduced TR proportionally more than TUE, similar to wheat and barley19. The indica panel had a lower average decrease in TUE compared with the aus panel (16.7% versus 24.4% for interval 2–6 days after treatment; Supplementary Table 1), and TUE was positively correlated with biomass production over time (RGR; Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Other physiological components are also likely to contribute to salinity tolerance, such as the maintenance of plant water status, transpiration (T) and transpiration use efficiency (TUE) (Harris et al , 2010; This et al , 2010; Barbieri et al , 2012); leaf area (Maggio et al , 2007); seed germination (Foolad and Lin, 1997); production of antioxidants (Ashraf, 2009); early seedling growth (Kingsbury and Epstein, 1984); and harvest index (HI) (Gholizadeh et al , 2014). Very little is known about these physiological components, so understanding the effects of salinity on these processes needs further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that the ability of plants to maintain normal rates of transpiration under saline conditions is an important indicator of salt tolerance, particularly because transpiration is related to normal rates of CO 2 uptake for photosynthesis (Harris et al , 2010). However, assessment of a plant’s transpiration rate using porometers (Meidner and Sheriff, 1976) and infra-red gas analysers (Nobel, 1991) can be difficult due to rapid changes in stomatal conductance that can occur in both space and time (Munns et al , 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An understanding of plant responses to water and salinity is of great practical significance. Recently, numerous studies have been carried out to investigate plant response to water and salt stress (Bassil and Kaffka, 2002;Katerji et al, 2003;Ashish et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2009;Clermont-Dauphina et al, 2010;Harris et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%