2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A wear mechanism map for the diamond polishing process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned earlier, chemical, mechanical, and thermal wear have all been argued to play a part in the removal process. It is, however, becoming clear that a number of competing processes may act, and that these are a function of the velocity of the sliding [3,4]. It is also clear that polishing on the scaife differs from low-speed frictional sliding due to the vastly different contact conditions, the materials involved and the velocity of sliding; comparisons should thus be made with caution.…”
Section: Wear Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned earlier, chemical, mechanical, and thermal wear have all been argued to play a part in the removal process. It is, however, becoming clear that a number of competing processes may act, and that these are a function of the velocity of the sliding [3,4]. It is also clear that polishing on the scaife differs from low-speed frictional sliding due to the vastly different contact conditions, the materials involved and the velocity of sliding; comparisons should thus be made with caution.…”
Section: Wear Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal wear has previously been dismissed due to reports [22] that material removal was linearly proportional to the abrading (NB: not polishing) velocity. These experiments were not carried out under industrial polishing conditions, rather on miniature grinding wheels and more recent research [3,4,17] challenges their view. van Bouwelen et al [27] suggest that a structural change due to the large shear stresses present at the diamond-scaife interface is responsible for the non-diamond carbon wear debris.…”
Section: Wear Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Up to now, regarding the mechanical lapping of single crystal diamonds, many material removal mechanisms were proposed including micro-cleavage along the (111) plane [1,2], thermal wear [3], electrical wear [2,4], fracture lapped in 'hard' direction [5,6], nanometric grooves lapped in 'soft' direction [7,8] and transformation of diamond to graphite [9] or sp3 hybridization structure to sp2 [6,[10][11][12]. But few works above were applied to well reveal the removal mechanism in the 'soft' and 'hard' directions at the same time.…”
Section: Lapping Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties make the mechanical polish (MP) or chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP, in which abrasive and corrosive chemical slurry reacts with sample surface to facilitate the mechanical polishing for material removal) of diamond surface a formidable task in terms of removal rate, resultant flatness, possible newly-introduced damages and the economic cost. Although MP is capable of removing the surface layer at a relatively high rate [5,6], CMP removal rate for single-crystal-diamond surface is generally no higher than 100 nm/h [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%