1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf02222144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A wearable tactile sensory aid for profoundly deaf children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With veridical multisensory information, these mechanisms appear to enhance perception accuracy and reaction time (Deiderich, 1995), as well as modulate ongoing cognitive processes (Schroeder & Foxe, 2005) while improving workload performance and SA (Wickens & Holland, 1999). By exploiting this cortical crossmodal integration (Calvert, 2001), we and other researchers have shown that individuals with sensory loss due to artificial restrictions, disease, congenital defect, or injury can use sensory substitution interfaces to exploit this inherent plasticity of the brain and nervous system for both long term and short term anatomical and functional remapping of sensory data (Walcott & Langdon, 2001;Ptito, Moesgaard, Gjedde & Kupers, 2005;Kaczmarek, Bach-y-Rita, Tompkins & Webster, 1985) and improvement in SA (Raj, Kass, & Perry, 2000;Saunders, Hill & Franklin, 1981). Recent brain imaging studies have confirmed crossmodal modulation of activity across different sensory cortices that varies depending on whether multiple sensory channels provide congruent information or incongruent information (Johnson & Zatorre, 2005;Jones & Callan, 2003;Fort, et al, 2002;Laurienti, et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With veridical multisensory information, these mechanisms appear to enhance perception accuracy and reaction time (Deiderich, 1995), as well as modulate ongoing cognitive processes (Schroeder & Foxe, 2005) while improving workload performance and SA (Wickens & Holland, 1999). By exploiting this cortical crossmodal integration (Calvert, 2001), we and other researchers have shown that individuals with sensory loss due to artificial restrictions, disease, congenital defect, or injury can use sensory substitution interfaces to exploit this inherent plasticity of the brain and nervous system for both long term and short term anatomical and functional remapping of sensory data (Walcott & Langdon, 2001;Ptito, Moesgaard, Gjedde & Kupers, 2005;Kaczmarek, Bach-y-Rita, Tompkins & Webster, 1985) and improvement in SA (Raj, Kass, & Perry, 2000;Saunders, Hill & Franklin, 1981). Recent brain imaging studies have confirmed crossmodal modulation of activity across different sensory cortices that varies depending on whether multiple sensory channels provide congruent information or incongruent information (Johnson & Zatorre, 2005;Jones & Callan, 2003;Fort, et al, 2002;Laurienti, et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the better-known systems used for such purposes are the Teletactor [62] and the Tactaid [63], [64] devices.…”
Section: A Auditory Feedback For Users With Auditory Impairmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial investigations with tactile displays explored their potential to compensate for sensory loss or impairment [1]. For example, sensory substitution devices have been developed to assist people with impaired vision [1], [7], hearing [8] or balance sense [9]. Unlike sensory substitution, which translates the form of one modality into the form of another; sensory augmentation adds new synthesized information to an existing sensory channel.…”
Section: Enhanced Awareness Through Haptic Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%