A Web-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool for Primary Health Care Management of Back Pain: Development and Mixed Methods Evaluation

Abstract

BackgroundMany patients with back pain do not receive health care in accordance with best practice recommendations. Implementation trials to address this issue have had limited success. Despite the known effectiveness of clinical decision support systems (CDSS), none of these are available for back pain management.ObjectiveThe objective of our study was to develop a Web-based CDSS to support Australian general practitioners (GPs) to diagnose and manage back pain according to guidelines.MethodsAsking a panel of international experts to review recommendations for sixteen clinical vignettes validated the tool. It was then launched nationally as part of National Pain Week and promoted to GPs via a media release and clinic based visits. Following this, a mixed methods evaluation was conducted to determine tool feasibility, acceptability, and utility. The 12 month usage data were analyzed, and in-depth, semistructured interviews with 20 GPs were conducted to identify barriers and enablers to uptake.ResultsThe tool had acceptable face validity when reviewed by experts. Over a 12 month period there were 7125 website visits with 4503 (63.20%) unique users. Assuming most unique users are GPs, around one quarter of the country’s GPs may have used the tool at least once. Although usage was high, GP interviews highlighted the sometimes complex nature of management where the tool may not influence care. Conversely, several “touch-points”, whereby the tool may exert its influence, were identified, most notably patient engagement.ConclusionsA novel CDSS tool has the potential to assist with evidence-based management of back pain. A clinical trial is required to determine its impact on practitioner and patient outcomes.

Attitudes of optometrists towards artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of retinal disease: A cross‐sectional mail‐out survey

“…Clinicians are known to adopt clinical decision support systems judiciously depending on social and environmental factors 33,34 . Thus, optometrists' attitudes towards AI may vary depending on the specific circumstances in which it is being used.…”

“…Clinicians are known to adopt clinical decision support systems judiciously depending on social and environmental factors. 33 , 34 Thus, optometrists' attitudes towards AI may vary depending on the specific circumstances in which it is being used. Kawamoto et al 35 conducted a large systematic review of 70 randomised controlled trials evaluating clinical decision support systems, and identified the provision of recommendations at the time and location of decision‐making as one of four independent predictors of improved clinical practice ( p = 0.03), defined by patient outcomes or process measures.…”

A national intervention to reduce imaging for low back pain by general practitioners: a retrospective economic program evaluation using Medicare Benefits Schedule data

“…The tool was developed in collaboration with the George Institute for Global Health and published online in 2012. [24]…”

Using theory to improve low back pain care in Australian Aboriginal primary care: a mixed method single cohort pilot study

“…This includes embedding STarT Back within the clinic management software or introducing a “tick box” within electronic patient records when psychosocial assessment and care has been provided. As has been noted with other online clinical aids, to increase uptake tools need to be integrated into existing systems and routine workflow [ 42 ]. This would also allow reliable recording of practice for future research.…”