2005
DOI: 10.1080/02781070500032895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Weierstrass representation theorem for Lorentz surfaces

Abstract: We consider functions with values in the algebra of Lorentz numbers L which are differentiable with respect to the algebraic structure of L as an analogue of holomorphic functions. Then we apply these functions to prove a Weierstrass representation theorem for Lorentz surfaces immersed in the space R 3 1 . In the proof we essentially follow the model of the complex numbers. We apply our representation theorem to construct explicit minimal immersions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
36
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…First we shall recall the notion of paracomplex algebra. For a more detailed exposition on paracomplex numbers, see [5,9,13] and their references. Let C be the 2-dimensional commutative algebra of the form C = R1 ⊕ Rj with multiplication law: j · 1 = 1 · j = j, j 2 = 1.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First we shall recall the notion of paracomplex algebra. For a more detailed exposition on paracomplex numbers, see [5,9,13] and their references. Let C be the 2-dimensional commutative algebra of the form C = R1 ⊕ Rj with multiplication law: j · 1 = 1 · j = j, j 2 = 1.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we prove the generalized Weierstrass formula for a Lorentz surface conformally immersed into R 2,2 (Theorem 1). As a consequence of this formula, we deduce a generalized formula for a Lorentz surface conformally immersed in the three-dimensional Minkowski space R 2,1 , analogous to the case of surfaces in R 3 (see [10, Section 2]); in particular, we obtain the classical Weierstrass representation of a minimal Lorentz surface in R 2,1 given by J. Konderak [9].…”
Section: Spinor Representation Of a Lorentzian Surface In R 22mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As the 1-sheeted hyperboloid S 1,1 = {x ∈ R 2,1 |(x, x) = 1} is a timelike surface in Minkowski space Christoffel duality leads to Konderak's Weierstrass-type representation [11,Thm 3.3] for minimal timelike surfaces in Minkowski space: instead of holomorphic functions this representation employs para-holomorphic functions, defined on the algebra of Lorentz-numbers,…”
Section: The Timelike Hyperboloidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] and [12,Prop 3.1]. As the EnneperWeierstrass representation for minimal surfaces in Euclidean space provides a method to explicitly determine the Christoffel dual of a tri-axial ellipsoid, so do Kobayashi's and Konderak's Weierstrass type representations for maximal and timelike minimal surfaces in Minkowski space to find the Christoffel duals of hyperboloids, see [10] resp [11]. To investigate timelike minimal surfaces we derive some results on paraholomorphic functions, in particular, we introduce para-complex analogues of the Jacobi elliptic functions in Def & Cor A.2, cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%