2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21072324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Weighted and Distributed Algorithm for Range-Based Multi-Hop Localization Using a Newton Method

Abstract: Wireless sensor networks are used in many location-dependent applications. The location of sensor nodes is commonly carried out in a distributed way for energy saving and network robustness, where the handling of these characteristics is still a great challenge. It is very desirable that distributed algorithms invest as few iterations as possible with the highest accuracy on position estimates. This research proposes a range-based and robust localization method, derived from the Newton scheme, that can be appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, scholars at home and abroad have also begun to optimize the node positioning algorithm using strategies such as swarm intelligence optimization algorithm, mobile nodes and deep learning. Abd El Aziz M [24] designed a localization method based on time difference of arrival (TDOA) and frequency difference of arrival (FDOA), which improves the localization accuracy of the algorithm by introducing the free gradient method and solves the problem of slow convergence of cuckoo algorithm; Roman et al [25] designed a new distributed localization algorithm (RWNM-DV-Hop) based on the Newton-Raphson method, which effectively reduces the error introduced in the distance estimation phase by weighting the number of hops between neighboring sensor nodes using dynamic scaling parameters; Zhao et al [26] proposed an improved localization algorithm by combining RSSI and back propagation neural network (BP) model for the problem that the classical localization algorithm produces a large localization error during the localization process, and experiments proved that this algorithm consumes slightly more energy than other algorithms, but the localization effect is significantly improved; Yang et al [27] proposed a probabilistic KNN (k-Nearest Neighbor) algorithm (P-KNN), which uses the probability of RSSI in the radio map as a weight for calculating the Euclidean distance and filters RSSI values with probability less than 3% . Meanwhile, for passive indoor localization scenarios, the access point (AP) collects RSSI when the mobile terminal (MT) is not connected to the access point.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, scholars at home and abroad have also begun to optimize the node positioning algorithm using strategies such as swarm intelligence optimization algorithm, mobile nodes and deep learning. Abd El Aziz M [24] designed a localization method based on time difference of arrival (TDOA) and frequency difference of arrival (FDOA), which improves the localization accuracy of the algorithm by introducing the free gradient method and solves the problem of slow convergence of cuckoo algorithm; Roman et al [25] designed a new distributed localization algorithm (RWNM-DV-Hop) based on the Newton-Raphson method, which effectively reduces the error introduced in the distance estimation phase by weighting the number of hops between neighboring sensor nodes using dynamic scaling parameters; Zhao et al [26] proposed an improved localization algorithm by combining RSSI and back propagation neural network (BP) model for the problem that the classical localization algorithm produces a large localization error during the localization process, and experiments proved that this algorithm consumes slightly more energy than other algorithms, but the localization effect is significantly improved; Yang et al [27] proposed a probabilistic KNN (k-Nearest Neighbor) algorithm (P-KNN), which uses the probability of RSSI in the radio map as a weight for calculating the Euclidean distance and filters RSSI values with probability less than 3% . Meanwhile, for passive indoor localization scenarios, the access point (AP) collects RSSI when the mobile terminal (MT) is not connected to the access point.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bluetooth location technology is easy to integrate into mobile devices such as mobile phones and is ideal for commercial promotion [ 5 ]. The disadvantage is that the cost of the positioning system is relatively high, the stability is poor, and the interference information in the indoor environment is considerable [ 6 ]. Radio Frequency Identification (RFID): Determines the use of radio frequency for contactless two-way communication to exchange data bit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%