2020
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201900216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A weighted FDR procedure under discrete and heterogeneous null distributions

Abstract: This article has earned an open data badge "Reproducible Research" for making publicly available the code necessary to reproduce the reported results. The results reported in this article were reproduced partially due to their computational complexity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The important variables in the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) projection were determined using the ropls R-package. P<0.05 with corresponding q-value (FDR)<0.05 were considered statistically significant [29]. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed using pROC to plot significant metabolites [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important variables in the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) projection were determined using the ropls R-package. P<0.05 with corresponding q-value (FDR)<0.05 were considered statistically significant [29]. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed using pROC to plot significant metabolites [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our method with Habiger's method and three other methods designed for multiple discrete testing (Gilbert, ; Heller and Gur, ; Chen and Doerge, ), in their true FDR and statistical power at different nominal FDR level α, where the statistical power is defined as the ratio between the number of correct rejections and the number of true non‐null hypotheses.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then compared our method with the widely‐used q ‐value method under two nominal FDR levels α=0.05 and 0.1, respectively. Because Habiger's method produces random decisions, and the method of Chen and Doerge () is computationally too intense to handle multiple testing at this large scale, we did not include them.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations