IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing 2002
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2002.5745269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A weighted linear prediction method for near-field source localization

Abstract: This paper deals with the near field source localization problem using the array output second order statistics (SOS). The range and angle parameters are estimated through a weighted linear pre diction (LP) algorithm applied to a properly chosen array output correlation sequence. Detailed perfonnance analysis and deriva tion of the optimal weightings are provided. Simulation results are finally presented to validate the theoretical analysis results and to assess the perfonnance of the proposed method 0-7803-74… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the existing near-field sources localization techniques [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 14 ] use an approximated model, and ULA is often used in the approximated model-based methods. The approximated path differences—which are the second-order Taylor approximations of Equations ( 4 ) and ( 5 )—can respectively be written as [ 6 ] and …”
Section: Approximated Model-based Methods Proposed In [ 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the existing near-field sources localization techniques [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 14 ] use an approximated model, and ULA is often used in the approximated model-based methods. The approximated path differences—which are the second-order Taylor approximations of Equations ( 4 ) and ( 5 )—can respectively be written as [ 6 ] and …”
Section: Approximated Model-based Methods Proposed In [ 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing near-field sources localization techniques [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] are based on an approximated model. In practice, a near-field point source has a spherical wavefront [ 6 ], which implies a nonlinear model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore unlike most of the existing algorithm {e.g. [2–5, 16]}, the proposed algorithm can offer enhanced estimation precision of DOA and range by extending the inter‐grid spacing without adding more sensors. Remarks B Regarding the main computational complexity, our algorithm requires ( N − 1)(8 M ) 2 + (4/3)(8 M ) 3 multiplications involved in calculating the SOS and in performing the eigen‐decompositions [8]. In contrast, using the HOS‐based algorithm [4] for our estimation problem would result in 4 N (6 M ) 2 + (4 / 3)(6 M ) 3 multiplications in terms of the above two procedures.…”
Section: Algorithm Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near‐field source localisation with a passive sensor array is one of the issues in array signal processing fields, since the near‐field source case can often occur, for example, in sonar, electronic surveillance and seismic exploration. Many approaches have been already developed, including maximum‐likelihood method [1], two‐dimensional multiple signal classification (MUSIC) method [2, 3], estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques (ESPRIT)‐like based on high‐order statistics (HOS) [4], the weighted linear prediction method [5] etc. Unfortunately, most of these methods involve either multidimensional search or HOS, which lead to a high computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies [ 13 , 14 ] estimated the source azimuths by constructing a higher order statistics (HOS) matrix to reduce the array aperture loss. There are also some other near-field parameter estimation methods, such as, the maximum likelihood estimator proposed in [ 15 ] and the weighted linear prediction method presented in [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%