2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2989200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Weighted Topic Model Learned From Local Semantic Space for Automatic Image Annotation

Abstract: Automatic image annotation plays a significant role in image understanding, retrieval, classification, and indexing. Today, it is becoming increasingly important in order to annotate large-scale social media images from content-sharing websites and social networks. These social images are usually annotated by user-provided low-quality tags. The topic model is considered as a promising method to describe these weak-labeling images by learning latent representations of training samples. The recent annotation met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The JEC model utilizes various low-level image features and a simple combination of basic distance measures to find the nearest neighbors of a given image. It creates a family of very simple and intuitive baseline methods for image annotation [20]. Guillaumin et al presented the TagProp [12] method, which learns the weight of each feature group and uses the label relevance prediction to annotate images [2].…”
Section: Nearest Neighbor Based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The JEC model utilizes various low-level image features and a simple combination of basic distance measures to find the nearest neighbors of a given image. It creates a family of very simple and intuitive baseline methods for image annotation [20]. Guillaumin et al presented the TagProp [12] method, which learns the weight of each feature group and uses the label relevance prediction to annotate images [2].…”
Section: Nearest Neighbor Based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides per-label metrics, more and more researchers adopt per-image metrics (also including precision, recall, and F1-measure) to evaluate annotation performance [9]- [11], [20], [30], [37], the per-label metrics are biased toward infrequent labels because making them correct could have a very significant impact on final accuracy [10]. These values are averaged over all the images in the test dataset to get This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.…”
Section: B Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Song et al [17] also describes automated image annotation. Their approach includes the use of an intermediate layer in a neural network to extract data from images more accurately.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These topic models are trained in the entire image database; therefore, they could not be applied to a larger image database because of expensive spacetime overheads. The local learning-based PLSA (LL-PLSA) approach, which models from a fixed number of neighbor images rather than the entire image database, significantly improves performance and can scale to large-scale image databases [33].…”
Section: E Topic Model Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some researchers have pointed out that the perlabel metrics are biased toward infrequent labels because making them correct could have a very significant impact on final accuracy [25]. Therefore, they propose per-image metrics (sometimes called as overall metrics) to evaluate annotation performance [1], [5], [14], [25], [29], [32], [33]. These values are averaged over all the images in the test dataset to get average (percentage) per-image precision (P rec I ) and average per-label recall (Rec I ), respectively.…”
Section: B Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%