2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-7740-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A weighting scheme for mining key skeletal joints for human action recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some approaches, the features computed from the action sequences are clustered into posture visual words (representing the prototypical poses of actions), and then the temporal evolutions of those visual words are modeled by explicit methods such as hidden Markov models (HMM) [68,69] or conditional random fields (CRF) [70,71]. Some other approaches consider the manifold of the trajectories [72] or use hierarchical extended histogram (HEH) for modeling temporal variation of features acquired from individual frames of input sequence [73]. These hand-crafted features and descriptors are recently substituted with deep representations to automatically extract high-level information from training data without using hand-crafted rules.…”
Section: Temporal Modeling In Action Recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some approaches, the features computed from the action sequences are clustered into posture visual words (representing the prototypical poses of actions), and then the temporal evolutions of those visual words are modeled by explicit methods such as hidden Markov models (HMM) [68,69] or conditional random fields (CRF) [70,71]. Some other approaches consider the manifold of the trajectories [72] or use hierarchical extended histogram (HEH) for modeling temporal variation of features acquired from individual frames of input sequence [73]. These hand-crafted features and descriptors are recently substituted with deep representations to automatically extract high-level information from training data without using hand-crafted rules.…”
Section: Temporal Modeling In Action Recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average activity accuracy levels obtained were, respectively, 93.5% and 92.3%. In 2019, Shabaninia et al [41] considered weighted 3D joints for human activity presentation. The average accuracy level obtained was 94.94%.…”
Section: Comparisons With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic Bayesian Mixture Model [23] 2014 91.9% Support Vector Machine + Hidden Markov Model [26] 2015 77.3% Multiclass Support Vector Machine [25] 2016 93.5 Classifier Ensemble [12] 2018 92.3% Weighted 3D joints [41] 2019 94.4% Our System 2020 95.5%…”
Section: Year Acc (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skeletal data, used as high-level information, is robust against different views, backgrounds, and motion speeds (Shabaninia et al 2019). However, sparse information of 3D joints in skeletal data is insufficient to model human actions, especially human-object interactions fully.…”
Section: Rgb and Skeletonmentioning
confidence: 99%