2015
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201502205
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Well‐Defined Aluminum‐Based Lewis Acid as an Effective Catalyst for Diels–Alder Transformations

Abstract: A catalytically active aluminum-based system for Diels-Alder transformations is reported. The system was generated by mixing a β-diketiminate-stabilized aluminum bistriflate compound with Na[BAr(Cl) 4 (Ar(Cl) =3,5-Cl2 C6 H3). Solid-state analysis of the catalytic system reveals a unique structure incorporating a two-dimensional coordination polymer. According to the experimental results obtained from several Diels-Alder transformations, the aluminum-based system appears to be a more practical and more robust a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To rationalize these differences, we explored the electronic and steric contributions to the reaction energy in each system. In both cases, and as previously seen for Lewis acid-catalyzed [4+2] cycloadditions, [67][68][69] the cages enhance the electrophilic character of the dienophile bound in the cavity. Polarization of the dienophile within the cage leads to a net charge of +0.25 and +0.16 in bq for C-1 and C-2, respectively, 70 leading to a lowering the LUMO energy by 1.5 and 1.6 eV in C-1 and C-2, respectively (Table S19).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…To rationalize these differences, we explored the electronic and steric contributions to the reaction energy in each system. In both cases, and as previously seen for Lewis acid-catalyzed [4+2] cycloadditions, [67][68][69] the cages enhance the electrophilic character of the dienophile bound in the cavity. Polarization of the dienophile within the cage leads to a net charge of +0.25 and +0.16 in bq for C-1 and C-2, respectively, 70 leading to a lowering the LUMO energy by 1.5 and 1.6 eV in C-1 and C-2, respectively (Table S19).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…To rationalize these differences, we explored the electronic and steric aspect of each system. In both cases, and as previously seen for Lewis acid-catalyzed [4+2] cycloadditions, [71][72][73] the cages enhance the electrophilic character of the dienophile bound in the cavity. Polarization of the dienophile within the cage leads to a net charge of +0.25 and +0.16 in bq for C-1 and C-2, respectively ( Figure S14), 74 leading to a lowering the LUMO energy by 1.6 / 1.5 eV in C-1 and C-2, respectively.…”
Section: Catalyzed Reactionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…1.798 Å) and 3b (avg. 1.805 Å) are longer than the 1.767 Å observed in (Ar‐nacnac)AlOTf 2 (Ar = 2,6‐ i Pr 2 –C 6 H 3 ), implying the dissociation of triflate may take place in solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In an attempt to introduce triflates into the compounds, the initial approach was to follow the synthetic protocol developed for (Ar‐nacnac)AlOTf 2 (Ar = C 6 F 5 , 2,6‐ i Pr 2 –C 6 H 3 ), in which the halide substituent at Al was substituted by triflate via addition of AgOTf into the CH 3 CN solution of (Ar‐nacnac)AlCl 2 at room temperature. [11a], The η 1 ‐Cp*AlCl 2 (SIMes) ( 1 ) obtained from coordination of SIMes to [η 5 ‐Cp*AlCl 2 ] 2 (Scheme ) features a 27 Al NMR resonance at δ = 104 ppm, which is considerably downfield shifted compared to that of [Cp*AlCl 2 ] 2 ( δ = –51 ppm). The observed chemical shift is in accordance with the change in hapticity of Cp* from η 5 to η 1 yielding a tetra‐coordinated Al center.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%