2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-022-10225-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A well-studied parasitoid fly of field crickets uses multiple alternative hosts in its introduced range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ormia ochracea larvae can develop in a range of natural host cricket species that vary depending on geographic location (Gray et al, 2019(Gray et al, , 2007Sakaguchi and Gray, 2011;Walker, 1993;Walker and Wineriter, 1991). In the laboratory, manual parasitization experiments have established that O. ochracea larvae can successfully develop in other cricket species that are not known to be their natural hosts, but pupation success can be lower than compared to those developing in natural hosts (Adamo et al, 1995a;Broder et al, 2023;Thomson et al, 2012;Wineriter and Walker, 1990). For example, 54 -61% of manually parasitized Gryllus texensis (natural host) resulted in successful larval emergence and pupation, while only 32 -35% (55 used in this study) of manually parasitized Gryllus assimilis resulted in successful larval emergence and pupation (Thomson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ormia ochracea larvae can develop in a range of natural host cricket species that vary depending on geographic location (Gray et al, 2019(Gray et al, , 2007Sakaguchi and Gray, 2011;Walker, 1993;Walker and Wineriter, 1991). In the laboratory, manual parasitization experiments have established that O. ochracea larvae can successfully develop in other cricket species that are not known to be their natural hosts, but pupation success can be lower than compared to those developing in natural hosts (Adamo et al, 1995a;Broder et al, 2023;Thomson et al, 2012;Wineriter and Walker, 1990). For example, 54 -61% of manually parasitized Gryllus texensis (natural host) resulted in successful larval emergence and pupation, while only 32 -35% (55 used in this study) of manually parasitized Gryllus assimilis resulted in successful larval emergence and pupation (Thomson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Hawaii, where the preferred host cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus continue to evolve in response to selection imposed by O. ochracea, some crickets have lost the ability to produce calling songs (Rayner et al, 2019;Zuk et al, 2006), while others have been rapidly evolving more cryptic calling songs with frequency content that differs from ancestral Teleogryllus oceanicus calling songs (Broder et al, 2022;Gallagher et al, 2022;Tinghitella et al, 2021Tinghitella et al, , 2018. These changes to cricket calling songs may have led to the switching to alternative host species (Broder et al, 2023). At present, it is unknown what allows a field cricket species to be suitable for the development of O. ochracea larvae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known that O. ochracea occurs in parts of Mexico, in the southern USA, and on some Hawaiian Islands [ 48 ]. In each of these regions, O. ochracea are behaviourally specialized to prefer specific host cricket species [ 38 ], and it is clear that some populations of O. ochracea may recognize and use multiple host cricket species [ 37 , 49 , 50 ]. Species-specific differences in cricket songs are largely based on the temporal patterning of sound pulses [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that O. ochracea occurs across parts of Mexico, in the southern US, and on some Hawaiian Islands [63]. In each of these regions, O. ochracea are behaviorally specialized to prefer specific host cricket species [48] and it is clear that some populations of O. ochracea may recognize and utilize multiple host cricket species [47,64,65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%