2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A whole blood test to measure SARS-CoV-2-specific response in COVID-19 patients

Abstract: Objectives To examine whether specific T-cell-responses to SARS-CoV-2 peptides can be detected in COVID-19 using a whole-blood experimental setting, which may be further explored as potential diagnostic tool. Methods We evaluated IFN-γ levels after stimulating whole-blood with spike and remainder-antigens peptides megapools (MP) derived from SARS-CoV-2 sequences; IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17A, eotaxin, bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
134
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
134
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To better address the effect of baricitinib on the response to SARS-CoV-2-peptides, we analyzed the IFN-γ response considering only the IFN-γ values >0 IU/mL (Supplementary Figure 1 and 2). In COVID-19, the decreasing effect of baricitinib was observed mainly in patients with an IFN-γ response higher than the cut-off already published for both spike-antigen (0.16 IU/mL) (spike median: 0.31, IQR: 0.12-1.73; spike+baricitinib 10 nM median 0.17, IQR: 0.05-1.49; spike+baricitinib 1000 nM median 0.1, IQR: 0-0.18) and remainder-antigens-MPs (0.095 IU/mL) (remainder-antigens median: 0.26, IQR: 0.09-1.00; remainder-antigens+baricitinib 10 nM median 0.09, IQR: 0.03-0.3; remainder-antigens+baricitinib 1000 nM median 0.07, IQR: 0-0.27) 20 (Supplementary Figure 2A-B, red lines indicate responses over the cut-off). Similar results were obtained in “NO COVID-19” (spike median: 0.08, IQR: 0.02-0.4; spike+baricitinib 10 nM median 0.04, IQR: 0-0.33; spike+baricitinib 1000 nM median 0.02, IQR: 0-0.13; remainder-antigens median: 0.04, IQR: 0.01-0.16; remainder-antigens+baricitinib 10 nM median 0.03, IQR: 0.01-0.08; remainder-antigens+baricitinib 1000 nM median 0.01, IQR: 0-0.04) (Supplementary Figure 2C-D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To better address the effect of baricitinib on the response to SARS-CoV-2-peptides, we analyzed the IFN-γ response considering only the IFN-γ values >0 IU/mL (Supplementary Figure 1 and 2). In COVID-19, the decreasing effect of baricitinib was observed mainly in patients with an IFN-γ response higher than the cut-off already published for both spike-antigen (0.16 IU/mL) (spike median: 0.31, IQR: 0.12-1.73; spike+baricitinib 10 nM median 0.17, IQR: 0.05-1.49; spike+baricitinib 1000 nM median 0.1, IQR: 0-0.18) and remainder-antigens-MPs (0.095 IU/mL) (remainder-antigens median: 0.26, IQR: 0.09-1.00; remainder-antigens+baricitinib 10 nM median 0.09, IQR: 0.03-0.3; remainder-antigens+baricitinib 1000 nM median 0.07, IQR: 0-0.27) 20 (Supplementary Figure 2A-B, red lines indicate responses over the cut-off). Similar results were obtained in “NO COVID-19” (spike median: 0.08, IQR: 0.02-0.4; spike+baricitinib 10 nM median 0.04, IQR: 0-0.33; spike+baricitinib 1000 nM median 0.02, IQR: 0-0.13; remainder-antigens median: 0.04, IQR: 0.01-0.16; remainder-antigens+baricitinib 10 nM median 0.03, IQR: 0.01-0.08; remainder-antigens+baricitinib 1000 nM median 0.01, IQR: 0-0.04) (Supplementary Figure 2C-D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was conducted also evaluating samples from COVID-19 patients and “NO COVID-19” individuals who were part of a previous cohort (study approval number 59/2020). 20 All the enrolled individuals provided an informed written consent. All the participants’ data were anonymized and identified by codes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further optimizations are in progress, based on inclusion of specific viral antigens and exclusion of specific epitopes. We anticipate that in the future we will be able to combine these improved pools, perhaps in conjunction with recently described whole blood assays ( 63 , 64 ) to easily, accurately and independently assay levels of T cell reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 and CCC in different populations, such as pediatric cohorts versus older subjects, cohorts from different geographical locations associated with differential exposure to CCC, differential disease incidence, and other variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%