2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A whole-genome sequence based association study on pork eating quality traits and cooking loss in a specially designed heterogeneous F6 pig population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The values determined for cooking losses of pig slices treated by different methods ( Table 2 ) were comparable to those reported in distinct pig muscles by other authors who obtained values ranging between 10–43% [ 24 , 37 , 38 ]. With respect to the use of chestnut in the finishing diet, this seemed to significantly ( P < 0.05) increase the cooking loss in all heat treatments, except in grilled.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The values determined for cooking losses of pig slices treated by different methods ( Table 2 ) were comparable to those reported in distinct pig muscles by other authors who obtained values ranging between 10–43% [ 24 , 37 , 38 ]. With respect to the use of chestnut in the finishing diet, this seemed to significantly ( P < 0.05) increase the cooking loss in all heat treatments, except in grilled.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Wang et al It is predicted that TNNT3 can regulate muscle growth and muscle fibers [25]. TNNT3 is an important part of pig skeletal muscle filaments, that can affect the taste and tenderness of pork [26,27]. Its expression level was low in the LW group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al It is predicted that TNNT3 can regulate muscle growth and muscle bers [29]. TNNT3 is an important part of pig skeletal muscle laments, that can affect the taste and tenderness of pork [30,31]. Its expression level was low in the LW group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%