2018
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2782792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Wide-Area Dynamic Damping Controller Based on Robust <italic>H</italic>∞ Control for Wide-Area Power Systems With Random Delay and Packet Dropout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies such as [4] have analysed damping performance when using signals such as voltage angle difference that can easily be computed using data from multiple Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs). Similar studies using off-line, simulation-based studies that analyze the use of remote/PMU-based signals in damping loops can be traced to the 90's [27] until recently [26], and have largely focused on control design aspects [26], analysis of communication impact and impairment [28], [30], signal selection [29], etc. Nevertheless, very little research has addressed the actual implementation of such control systems in practice other than field testing, with notable exceptions [31] that focus on gain scheduling and model identification approaches.…”
Section: A Literature Review 1) Feasibility and Design Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies such as [4] have analysed damping performance when using signals such as voltage angle difference that can easily be computed using data from multiple Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs). Similar studies using off-line, simulation-based studies that analyze the use of remote/PMU-based signals in damping loops can be traced to the 90's [27] until recently [26], and have largely focused on control design aspects [26], analysis of communication impact and impairment [28], [30], signal selection [29], etc. Nevertheless, very little research has addressed the actual implementation of such control systems in practice other than field testing, with notable exceptions [31] that focus on gain scheduling and model identification approaches.…”
Section: A Literature Review 1) Feasibility and Design Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controls based on local measurements can damp certain modes, but they lack sufficient observability to properly damp inter-area oscillations [20]- [22]. On the other hand, the increasing number of phasor measurement units (PMUs) in power systems and the advances in wide-area measurement systems have enabled to implement control strategies using remote measurements in nearly real time [22]- [24]. Remote measurements transmit information related to the overall network dynamics and have a much higher observability of inter-area modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 PSS is a very effective controller, it is widely employed to improve the damping of LFOs by bringing in the additional signals into the excitation controllers of the generators. 6 Since the ease of its online tuning parameters, such as structure and reliability, PSS with lead–lag control structure is still prior considered when implemented in real power systems. LFOs can be sufficiently damped by the appropriate selection of conventional lead–lag controller parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%