“…These WGAs were generated mostly with long-read sequencing data (PacBio or ONT), however we also included three WGAs generated with short-read sequencing data for S. cerevisiae that showed evidence of Tsu4 internal regions (strain 245 from (Marsit et al ., 2015); strains AFQ and CDM from (Peter et al ., 2018)) and two WGAs generated with short-read sequencing data for S. arboricola (strain H-6 from (Liti et al ., 2013) and strain ZP960 from (Peris et al ., 2023)) that represent the best available WGAs for this species. In total, we analyzed 183 S. cerevisiae WGAs (Marsit et al ., 2015; Yue et al ., 2017; Peter et al ., 2018; O’Donnell et al ., 2023), 12 S. paradoxus WGAs (Yue et al ., 2017; Eberlein et al ., 2019; Chen et al ., 2022b), two S. mikatae WGAs (this study), two S. jurei WGAs (Naseeb et al ., 2018), three S. kudriavzevii WGAs (Boonekamp et al ., 2018; Salzberg et al ., 2022), two S. arboricola WGAs (Liti et al ., 2013; Peris et al ., 2023), two S. uvarum WGAs (Chen et al ., 2022a; Salzberg et al ., 2022), and four S. eubayanus WGAs (Brickwedde et al ., 2018; Brouwers et al ., 2019; Mardones et al ., 2022).…”